The Psychometric Properties of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills in Clinical Populations

被引：45

作者：

Baum, Corinna ^{[1
]}

Kuyken, Willem ^{[2
]}

Bohus, Martin ^{[3
]}

Heidenreich, Thomas ^{[4
]}

Michalak, Johannes ^{[5
]}

Steil, Regina ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Otto Friedrich Univ Bamberg, Lehrstuhl Physiol Psychol, D-96045 Bamberg, Germany

[2] Univ Exeter, Exeter, Devon, England

[3] Cent Inst Mental Hlth, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany

[4] Univ Appl Sci Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany

[5] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Bochum, Germany

来源：

ASSESSMENT | 2010年 / 17卷 / 02期

关键词：

Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills; mindfulness; reliability; depression; posttraumatic stress disorder; borderline personality disorder; BEHAVIORAL-THERAPY; COGNITIVE THERAPY; FIT INDEXES; SELF-REPORT; COVARIANCE; RELAPSE/RECURRENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; PREVENTION; DEPRESSION; VALIDITY;

D O I：

10.1177/1073191109356525

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) is a well-validated multidimensional questionnaire measuring dimensions of mindfulness on four scales: Observing, Describing,Act With Awareness, and Accept Without Judgment. Even though the KIMS has been used in several clinical studies no information is available about the psychometric properties in different clinical samples. The present study includes two clinical samples: a German sample of people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, or major depression and an English sample of people diagnosed with recurrent depression. Results of confirmatory factor analysis offer good support for the hypothesized model of four correlated factors, whereas the model of one general underlying mindfulness factor as a second order construct was not confirmed. Furthermore, our analyses revealed that the KIMS scales show high internal consistency and that all KIMS scales are sensitive to change in a subsample of participants taking part in Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy.

引用

页码：220 / 229

页数：10

共 44 条

[21] Mindfulness skills and interpersonal behaviour [J].

Dekeyser, Mathias ;

Raes, Filip ;

Leijssen, Mia ;

Leysen, Sara ;

Dewulf, David .

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2008, 44 (05) :1235-1245

[22] A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder [J].

Ehlers, A ;

Clark, DM .

BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2000, 38 (04) :319-345

[23] Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) [J].

Feldman, Greg ;

Hayes, Adele ;

Kumar, Sameet ;

Greeson, Jeff ;

Laurenceau, Jean-Philippe .

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2007, 29 (03) :177-190

[24]

First M. B., 1995, STRUCTURED CLIN INTE

[25]

Follette V.M., 2006, Journal of Rational Emotive and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, V24, P45, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10942-006-0025-2, 10.1007/s10942-006-0025-2]

[26]

Graham J. W., 2003, HDB PSYCHOL RES METH, P87, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI0204, 10.1002/0471264385.wei0204]

[27] On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research [J].

Grossman, Paul .

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2008, 64 (04) :405-408

[28] Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].

Hu, Li-tze ;

Bentler, Peter M. .

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55

[29] Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification [J].

Hu, LT ;

Bentler, PM .

PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1998, 3 (04) :424-453

[30] Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future [J].

Kabat-Zinn, J .

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2003, 10 (02) :144-156

← 1 2 3 4 5 →