Response to preoperative chemoradiation increases the use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with locally advanced low rectal carcinoma

被引:161
作者
Crane, CH
Skibber, JM
Feig, BW
Vauthey, JN
Thames, HD
Curley, SA
Rodriguez-Bigas, MA
Wolff, RA
Ellis, LM
Delclos, ME
Lin, EH
Janjan, NA
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biomath, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
rectal carcinoma; radiotherapy; sphincter preservation; preoperative; chemoradiation;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.11075
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Although controversial, some believe that preoperative chemoradiation increases the use of sphincter-preserving surgery in low rectal carcinoma patients. This article investigates the relationship between objective tumor response and sphincter preservation in low rectal carcinoma patients. METHODS. The authors reviewed the records of 238 patients with T3 or T4 low rectal carcinoma (less than or equal to 6 cm from the anal verge) who underwent preoperative pelvic chemoradiation (45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, n = 182 or 52.5 Gy/30 fractions/5 weeks, n = 56 with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil at 300 mg/m(2), Monday to Friday) followed by mesorectal (n = 223) or local excision (n 15). A logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influence of objective tumor response (defined as complete clinical response) and other prognostic factors on sphincter preservation. Because degrees of partial response could not be objectively defined retrospectively, the influence of partial response on sphincter preservation could not be evaluated. RESULTS. Overall, 49% of patients (117 of 238) had sphincter-preserving surgery. The clinical complete response rate was 47%. Independent predictors of sphincter preservation included the year of surgery, tumor distance from the anal verge, circumferential tumor involvement, and response to chemoradiation. The sphincter preservation rate increased over the period of the study (from 28% [December 1989 to December 19921 to 44% [January 1993 to December 1996] to 67% [January 1997 to December 20001). The difference in the rates of sphincter preservation according to response was most striking among patients with tumors 3 cm or less from the anal verge (44% vs. 22%, P = 0.01). The pelvic disease recurrence rate among patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery has been less than 10% since January 1993 and was not statistically different between the groups treated from January 1993 to December 1996 and from January 1997 to December 2000. CONCLUSIONS. There has been an increase in the use of sphincter-preserving surgery without an increase in pelvic disease recurrence over the past decade. Although not necessary for sphincter preservation, clinical response to preoperative chemoradiation independently contributed to sphincter-preserving surgery, particularly in patients with low rectal tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 524
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: The Lyon R90-01 randomized trial [J].
Francois, Y ;
Nemoz, CJ ;
Baulieux, J ;
Vignal, J ;
Grandjean, JP ;
Partensky, C ;
Souquet, JC ;
Adeleine, P ;
Gerard, JP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (08) :2396-2402
[2]   Preoperative combined modality therapy for clinically resectable UT3 rectal adenocarcinoma [J].
Grann, A ;
Feng, C ;
Wong, D ;
Saltz, L ;
Paty, PP ;
Guillem, JG ;
Cohen, AM ;
Minsky, BD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (04) :987-995
[3]   A clinical trial to evaluate the worth of preoperative multimodality therapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the rectum - A progress report of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-03 [J].
Hyams, DM ;
Mamounas, EP ;
Petrelli, N ;
Rockette, H ;
Jones, J ;
Wieand, HS ;
Deutsch, M ;
Wickerham, DL ;
Fisher, B ;
Wolmark, N .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (02) :131-139
[4]   Locally advanced rectal cancer: Surgical complications after infusional chemotherapy and radiation therapy [J].
Janjan, NA ;
Khoo, VS ;
Rich, TA ;
Evetts, PA ;
Goswitz, MS ;
Allen, PK ;
Skibber, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (01) :131-136
[5]   Prospective trial of preoperative concomitant boost radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer [J].
Janjan, NA ;
Crane, CN ;
Feig, BW ;
Cleary, K ;
Dubrow, R ;
Curley, SA ;
Ellis, LM ;
Vauthey, JN ;
Lenzi, R ;
Lynch, P ;
Wolff, R ;
Brown, T ;
Pazdur, R ;
Abbruzzese, J ;
Hoff, PM ;
Allen, P ;
Brown, B ;
Skibber, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 47 (03) :713-718
[6]   Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation ln locally advanced rectal cancer: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience [J].
Janjan, NA ;
Khoo, VS ;
Abbruzzese, J ;
Pazdur, R ;
Dubrow, R ;
Cleary, KR ;
Allen, PK ;
Lynch, PM ;
Glober, G ;
Wolff, R ;
Rich, TA ;
Skibber, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (05) :1027-1038
[7]   EFFECT OF SURGICAL EXPERIENCE ON THE RESULTS OF RESECTION FOR ESOPHAGEAL-CARCINOMA [J].
MATTHEWS, HR ;
POWELL, DJ ;
MCCONKEY, CC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (08) :621-623
[8]   IMPACT OF VARIABILITY AMONG SURGEONS ON POSTOPERATIVE MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY AND ULTIMATE SURVIVAL [J].
MCARDLE, CS ;
HOLE, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 302 (6791) :1501-1505
[9]   DOES PREOPERATIVE RADIATION-THERAPY ENHANCE THE PROBABILITY OF LOCAL-CONTROL AND SURVIVAL IN HIGH-RISK DISTAL RECTAL-CANCER [J].
MENDENHALL, WM ;
BLAND, KI ;
COPELAND, EM ;
SUMMERS, GE ;
PFAFF, WW ;
SOUBA, WW ;
MILLION, RR ;
MARTIN, RG ;
TOWNSEND, CM ;
HORSLEY, JS ;
HUMPHREY, LJ .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1992, 215 (06) :696-706
[10]  
Pahlman L, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V336, P1539