An investigation into the association pattern technique as a quantitative approach to measuring means-end chains

被引:142
作者
ter Hofstede, F [1 ]
Audenaert, A
Steenkamp, JBEM
Wedel, M
机构
[1] Agr Univ Wageningen, Dept Mkt & Mkt Res, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Business Adm & Management Sci, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Unilever Res Lab, Colworth, England
[4] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Mkt, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
laddering; measurement; conditional independence; convergent validity;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8116(97)00029-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Means-end chain theory links products to consumers by postulating hierarchical relations between attributes of the product, consequences of product use and values of consumers. It has served as an important conceptual framework for studies in marketing. The authors investigate the association pattern technique (APT) as a supplement to laddering, the most popular, qualitative measurement methodology in means-end chains research. APT is a structured method for measuring means-end chains, suitable for large-scale surveys. It can be used in personal as well as quantitative mail interviews. APT separately measures the attribute-consequence, and the consequence-value links. The independence of attribute-consequence, and consequence-value links is crucial to the validity of APT. Using loglinear models, we investigate this assumption for empirical data on four different products. Consistent support for independence is found. In addition, we use loglinear models to test the convergent validity of APT and laddering with respect to the content and structure of the means-end chains network that they reveal. The results show that the content of the APT and laddering networks differs. This result is explained from the different task formats. Most importantly, the hypothesis that the structure of APT and laddering networks is the same could not be rejected. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 50
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Abbott L., 1955, Quality and Competition: An Essay in Economic Theory
[2]  
Agresti A., 1990, Analysis of categorical data
[3]   DIMENSIONS OF CONSUMER EXPERTISE [J].
ALBA, JW ;
HUTCHINSON, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (04) :411-454
[4]  
Aurifeille J.M., 1995, INT J RES MARK, V12, P267
[5]  
BETTMAN I, 1974, J CONSUM RES, V1, P71
[6]  
BONETT DG, 1983, PSYCHOL BULL, V93, P149
[7]  
CLAEYS C, 1995, J RES MARKETING, V12, P193
[8]   A MARKETERS GUIDE TO LOG-LINEAR MODELS FOR QUALITATIVE DATA-ANALYSIS [J].
DESARBO, WS ;
HILDEBRAND, DK .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1980, 44 (03) :40-51
[9]   DECISION ISSUES IN BUILDING PERCEPTUAL PRODUCT-SPACES WITH MULTI-ATTRIBUTE RATING DATA [J].
DILLON, WR ;
FREDERICK, DG ;
TANGPANICHDEE, V .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1985, 12 (01) :47-63
[10]  
Fienberg Stephen E., 1980, The Analysis of Cross-Classi?ed Categorical Data