The haptic oblique effect in the perception of rod orientation by blind adults

被引:45
作者
Gentaz, E [1 ]
Hatwell, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pierre Mendes France, Expt Psychol Lab, F-38040 Grenoble 9, France
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 1998年 / 60卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03211925
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The haptic perception of vertical, horizontal, + 45 degrees oblique, and + 135 degrees oblique orientations was studied in completely blind adults. The purpose was to determine whether the variations of the gravitational cues provided by the arm-hand system during scanning would affect the manifestation of the oblique effect (lower performance in oblique orientations than in vertical-horizontal ones) as they did in blindfolded sighted people (Gentaz & Hatwell, 1996). In blindfolded sighted adults, the oblique effect was reduced or absent when the magnitude of gravitational cues was decreased. If visual experience participated in the haptic oblique effect, we should observe no oblique effect in early blind subjects in the conditions of manual exploration where late blind and blindfolded sighted manifest this effect. The magnitude of gravitational cues was therefore varied by changing gravity constraints, whereas the variability of these cues was varied by changing the plane in which the task was performed: horizontal (low variability) and frontal (high variability). Early and late blind adults were asked to explore haptically a rod and then to reproduce its orientation ipsilaterally in one of two exploratory conditions in each plane. In the horizontal plane, the oblique effect was absent, whatever the gravity constraints, in both groups (early and late blind subjects). In the frontal plane, the oblique effect was present, whatever the gravity constraints, in both groups. Taken together, these results showed that, in blind people, the variability of gravitational cues played a role in the haptic oblique effect; no effect of previous visual experience was observed.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 167
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]  
Howard I. P., 1982, HUMAN VISUAL ORIENTA
[32]   ORIENTATIONAL ANISOTROPY IN THE HUMAN VISUAL-SYSTEM [J].
JENKINS, B .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1985, 37 (02) :125-134
[33]  
KLATZKY RL, 1995, J VISUAL IMPAIR BLIN, V89, P70
[34]   EFFECT OF LINE ORIENTATION ON VARIOUS INFORMATION-PROCESSING TASKS [J].
LASAGA, MI ;
GARNER, WR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1983, 9 (02) :215-225
[35]   PERCEPTUAL ORIENTATIONAL ASYMMETRIES - COMPARISON OF VISUAL AND HAPTIC SPACE [J].
LECHELT, EC ;
ELIUK, J ;
TANNE, G .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1976, 20 (06) :463-469
[37]   SPATIAL ANISOTROPY IN INTRAMODAL AND CROSS-MODAL JUDGMENTS OF STIMULUS ORIENTATION - THE STABILITY OF THE OBLIQUE EFFECT [J].
LECHELT, EC ;
VERENKA, A .
PERCEPTION, 1980, 9 (05) :581-589
[38]   SPATIAL AND MOVEMENT-BASED HEURISTICS FOR ENCODING PATTERN INFORMATION THROUGH TOUCH [J].
LEDERMAN, SJ ;
KLATZKY, RL ;
BARBER, PO .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1985, 114 (01) :33-49
[39]   COMPARISON OF CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FUNCTIONS ACROSS 3 ORIENTATIONS - IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY AND TESTING [J].
LONG, GM ;
TUCK, JP .
PERCEPTION, 1991, 20 (03) :373-380
[40]  
MARTINEZ F, 1971, PSYCHON SCI, V22, P124