Are epiphytes important for birds in coffee plantations?: An experimental assessment

被引:99
作者
Cruz-Angón, A
Greenberg, R
机构
[1] Inst Ecol, AC Dept Ecol Func, Xalapa 91070, Veracruz, Mexico
[2] Natl Zool Pk, Smithsonian Migratory Bird Ctr, Washington, DC 20008 USA
关键词
biodiversity; birds; community structure; shade coffee management; vascular epiphytes;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00983.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Coffee is produced in tropical regions of the world, largely in Latin America. Coffee cultivation techniques range from traditional systems, where coffee grows under a diverse canopy of shade trees (shade-coffee plantations), to modern systems, where coffee grows without any type of shade (sun-coffee plantations). Shade-coffee plantations provide refuge for forest fauna in otherwise deforested landscapes. The conservation value of these agro-ecosystems depends upon their structural and floristic diversity. 2. The way coffee producers manage the vegetation, including the epiphytic component, may profoundly affect the value of plantations for conserving biological diversity. Shade-coffee certification programmes have emerged to verify that coffee advertised as 'shade grown' is actually grown on highly biodiverse plantations. Although these programmes universally encourage epiphyte protection from pruning (a common practice), there has been no experimental evaluation of the importance of epiphytes in supporting faunal diversity. We report the effect of experimentally removing epiphytes on the bird assemblage in a shade-coffee farm near Coatepec, Veracruz, Mexico. 3. We established two matching pairs of epiphyte removal and control plots. We compared bird diversity and abundance, based on daily censuses during the breeding and non-breeding season. We used existing information on the way in which birds use epiphytes as foraging and nesting substrates to explain the presence of different species in plots with epiphytes. 4. Plots without epiphytes tended to be less diverse than plots with epiphytes, but rarefaction analysis and ANOVA showed no significant differences in species richness between treatments in any of the seasons. Mean bird abundance was significantly higher in plots with epiphytes during both seasons, and a multidimensional scaling analysis showed that bird community structure differed between the two treatments. 5. Eighteen forest bird species were significantly more abundant in plots with epiphytes. Three non-forest species were more common in plots without epiphytes. Resident bird species that used epiphytes as a nesting substrate were significantly more abundant in plots with epiphytes. 6. When epiphytes are removed, canopy cover, foraging substrates, nest sites and nest materials are eliminated and microclimatic conditions change. This could increase predation on adult birds and nests, increase intra- and interspecific competition, and decrease individual survivorship. 7. Synthesis and applications. This is the first experimental assessment of the importance of epiphytes for birds. Shade-coffee plantations with epiphytes maintain higher abundance and diversity of the inhabitant bird fauna than plantations without epiphytes. This study reinforces the value of positive epiphyte management as an important factor in shade-grown coffee certification, where the goal is to promote biodiversity conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 159
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, CHECK LIST N AM BIRD
[2]  
[Anonymous], ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOG
[3]  
Calder W. A., 1984, SIZE FUNCTION LIFE H
[4]   Interactions among environmental stress, body condition, nutritional status, and dominance in great tits [J].
Carrascal, LM ;
Senar, JC ;
Mozetich, I ;
Uribe, F ;
Domenech, J .
AUK, 1998, 115 (03) :727-738
[5]   DISPERSAL OF SEEDS AS NEST MATERIAL BY BIRDS IN SEMIARID KAROO SHRUBLAND [J].
DEAN, WRJ ;
MILTON, SJ ;
SIEGFRIED, WR .
ECOLOGY, 1990, 71 (04) :1299-1306
[6]  
Denslow JS, 1986, FRUGIVORES SEED DISP, P37
[7]   Reproductive success of migratory birds in habitat sources and sinks [J].
Donovan, TM ;
Thompson, FR ;
Faaborg, J ;
Probst, JR .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1995, 9 (06) :1380-1395
[8]   Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments [J].
Ferraz, G ;
Russell, GJ ;
Stouffer, PC ;
Bierregaard, RO ;
Pimm, SL ;
Lovejoy, TE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (24) :14069-14073
[9]  
García-Franco JG, 2001, BIOTROPICA, V33, P538, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2001.tb00209.x
[10]  
Gauch H., 1982, MULTIVARIATE ANAL CO