Development and validation of a method for the quantitation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid by liquid chromatography electrospray-mass-spectrometry

被引:39
作者
Concheiro, M [1 ]
de Castro, A [1 ]
Quintela, O [1 ]
Cruz, A [1 ]
López-Rivadulla, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago Compostela, Fac Med, Forens Toxicol Serv, Inst Legal Med, Santiago De Compostela 15786, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES | 2004年 / 810卷 / 02期
关键词
Delta(9)tetrahydrocannabinol; oral fluid; LC-MS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.08.017
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Analysis of Delta(9)tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)THC) and its metabolites in biological samples is of great relevance for forensic purposes. In the case of oral fluid (OF), the analysis should determine Delta(9)THC, whereas in urine, it detects the inactive metabolite tetrahydrocannabinol carboxylic acid (THC-COOH). Most laboratories analyze Delta(9)THC in such samples using GC-MS methods, but these procedures are time-consuming and involve unavoidable previous extraction and derivatization. No data is yet available on the application of liquid chromatography-mass-spectrometry to detect Delta(9)THC in oral fluid. We report a validation method in which the Delta(9)THC is isolated from oral fluid by a simple liquid-liquid extraction with hexane and subsequently analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass-spectrometry. The method here reported for the determination of Delta(9)THC in oral fluid only requires 200 mul of sample and achieves limits of detection of 2 ng/ml, and has been used to analyze oral fluid samples collected from current drug users. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 324
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Validation of chromatographic methods in biomedical analysis - Viewpoint and discussion [J].
Causon, R .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B, 1997, 689 (01) :175-180
[2]   Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse:: Positive prevalence rates by Intercept™ immunoassay screening and GC-MS-MS confirmation and suggested cutoff concentrations [J].
Cone, EJ ;
Presley, L ;
Lehrer, M ;
Seiter, W ;
Smith, M ;
Kardos, KW ;
Fritch, D ;
Salamone, S ;
Niedbala, RS .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2002, 26 (08) :541-546
[3]   SALIVA TESTING FOR DRUGS OF ABUSE [J].
CONE, EJ .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1993, 694 :91-127
[4]   LC-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-MS/MS analysis of multiple illicit drugs, methadone, and their metabolites in oral fluid following protein precipitation [J].
Dams, R ;
Murphy, CM ;
Choo, RE ;
Lambert, WE ;
De Leenheer, AP ;
Huestis, MA .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 75 (04) :798-804
[5]   SPME-GC analysis of THC in saliva samples collected with "EPITOPE" device [J].
Fucci, N ;
De Giovanni, N ;
Chiarotti, M ;
Scarlata, S .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 119 (03) :318-321
[6]  
Huestis M.A., 1998, DRUG ABUS HDB, P799
[7]  
HUESTIS MA, 1992, AAFS, V92, P190
[8]  
HUGHES JM, 2003, J ANAL TOXICOL, V27, P191
[9]   A REVIEW OF THE USE OF SALIVA IN THE FORENSIC DETECTION OF DRUGS AND OTHER CHEMICALS [J].
IDOWU, OR ;
CADDY, B .
JOURNAL OF THE FORENSIC SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1982, 22 (02) :123-135
[10]  
Jehanli A, 2001, J FORENSIC SCI, V46, P1214