The Long-Term Effects of Modified Electrode Surfaces and Intracochlear Corticosteroids on Postoperative Impedances in Cochlear Implant Patients

被引:72
作者
Paasche, Gerrit [1 ]
Tasche, Claudia [2 ]
Stoever, Timo [1 ]
Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke [1 ]
Lenarz, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Cochlear Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Cochlear Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Cochlear implant; Contour electrode; Electrical stimulation; Iridium-coated contacts; Postoperative impedance; Steroids; Stimulation effect; Tissue reaction; CHRONIC ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; HIGH STIMULUS RATES; AUDITORY-NERVE;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ab8fba
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term effect of intraoperative application of steroid suspension and coating of the electrode contacts with a thin film of iridium oxide on the intracochlear impedance development after cochlear implantation and on the impedance difference before and after stimulation. Design: Time-dependent development of intracochlear impedances was investigated in 4 different groups of adult patients up to 4 years after implantation. Additionally, during rehabilitation period just after first fitting, impedances before and after stimulation were measured as to investigate the influence of electrical stimulation on the impedances. Results from standard Nucleus 24 Contour (control), standard Nucleus 24 Contour with intraoperative application of steroids, iridium-coated Nucleus 24 Contour, and iridium-coated Nucleus 24 Contour with intraoperative application of steroids were compared. Results: Steroid application reduced impedances significantly throughout the observation period of up to 4 years after implantation. Iridium oxide coating had no effect. Differences between the groups were mainly found on the basal and middle parts of the cochlea, but not close to the tip of the array, also indicating that postoperative fibrous tissue growth is stronger in the basal region of the cochlea. Group mean values of the stimulation effect were not influenced by the different treatments. Nevertheless, only in both steroid-treated groups a correlation between the impedance before stimulation and the stimulation effect was found. Conclusion: Although the differences between control and steroid-treated groups decrease with time, single intraoperative intracochlear steroid deposition was proven to lower postoperative impedances during first 3 to 4 years after implantation probably because of reduction of fibrous tissue growth.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 598
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   FACTORS PREDICTING POSTOPERATIVE SENTENCE SCORES IN POSTLINGUISTICALLY DEAF ADULT COCHLEAR IMPLANT PATIENTS [J].
BLAMEY, PJ ;
PYMAN, BC ;
CLARK, GM ;
DOWELL, RC ;
GORDON, M ;
BROWN, AM ;
HOLLOW, RD .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1992, 101 (04) :342-348
[2]  
Busby P A, 2002, Cochlear Implants Int, V3, P87, DOI 10.1179/cim.2002.3.2.87
[3]   Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation [J].
Calmels, MN ;
Saliba, I ;
Wanna, G ;
Cochard, N ;
Fillaux, J ;
Deguine, O ;
Fraysse, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 68 (03) :347-351
[4]   Long-term evaluation of the effect of intracochlear steroid deposition on electrode impedance in cochlear implant patients [J].
De Ceulaer, G ;
Johnson, S ;
Yperman, M ;
Daemers, K ;
Offeciers, FE ;
O'Donoghue, GM ;
Govaerts, PJ .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2003, 24 (05) :769-774
[5]  
DEBOER RW, 1978, MED BIOL ENG COMPUT, V16, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF02442925
[6]   LONG-TERM MEASURES OF ELECTRODE IMPEDANCE AND AUDITORY-THRESHOLDS FOR THE INERAID COCHLEAR IMPLANT [J].
DORMAN, MF ;
SMITH, LM ;
DANKOWSKI, K ;
MCCANDLESS, G ;
PARKIN, JL .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1992, 35 (05) :1126-1130
[7]  
Huang Christie Qi, 2007, Cochlear Implants Int, V8, P123, DOI 10.1002/cii.336
[8]   Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area [J].
Huang, CQ ;
Shepherd, RK .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2000, 146 (1-2) :57-71
[9]  
HYLAND M, 2000, P 5 C INT FUNCT EL S
[10]  
Kawano A, 1998, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V118, P313