Do domestic cats impose an unsustainable harvest on urban bird populations?

被引:210
作者
van Heezik, Yolanda [1 ]
Smyth, Amber [1 ]
Adams, Amy [1 ]
Gordon, Joanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Zool, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
关键词
Felis catus; Impact; Population modelling; Home range; GPS; ZEALAND MAMMALOGY 1990-2000; FELIS-CATUS; HOUSE CATS; PET CATS; PREDATION; SUBURBAN; WILDLIFE; IMPACT; PREY; URBANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.013
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We assessed the impact of domestic cats on population persistence of native and exotic urban bird populations using a model adjusted for habitat-specific catch rates, cat ownership and hunting activity data. GPS-derived home ranges of 32 cats and resource selection indices demonstrated the degree of penetration and preference for native vegetation fragments. Owners reported on prey brought back by 144 domestic cats in Dunedin, New Zealand, during 12 months. One third of cats never brought back prey, and 21% returned more than one item/month. Cats brought back a mean of 13.4 prey items/year (median = 4), with cats aged <1 year returning more prey than older cats. Birds were the most common prey, followed by rodents. Although cats penetrated adjacent vegetation fragments they did not catch more birds and preferred garden habitat, suggesting that predation pressure may be reduced in fragments. Cat home range size appears to be constrained by cat density while the number of birds caught depends on the density of available prey. Estimates of city-wide catch for six bird species were either more than total urban population size estimates or close to lower confidence intervals. Modelling of three species indicated low likelihood of population persistence with cat predation. The observed persistence of these prey species suggests a meta-population structure with urban populations acting as sinks with source populations located on the city fringe. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 130
页数:10
相关论文
共 81 条
[21]   Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape [J].
Crooks, KR ;
Suarez, AV ;
Bolger, DT .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 115 (03) :451-462
[22]   Effects of radio-collar position and orientation on GPS radio-collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening [J].
D'Eon, RG ;
Delparte, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2005, 42 (02) :383-388
[23]  
D'Eon RG, 2002, WILDLIFE SOC B, V30, P430
[24]   Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia? [J].
Daniels, G. D. ;
Kirkpatrick, J. B. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 133 (03) :326-335
[25]   AVIAN GUILD STRUCTURE AND HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS IN SUBURBAN BIRD COMMUNITIES [J].
DEGRAAF, RM ;
WENTWORTH, JM .
URBAN ECOLOGY, 1986, 9 (3-4) :399-412
[26]  
*DEP CONS, 2006, NS0093 CANT CONS DEP
[27]   Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation [J].
Donnelly, R ;
Marzluff, JM .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) :733-745
[28]  
Fitzgerald B. Mike, 2000, P151
[29]   IS CAT CONTROL NEEDED TO PROTECT URBAN WILDLIFE [J].
FITZGERALD, BM .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1990, 17 (02) :168-169
[30]  
Fleming C. A., 1943, EMU, V42, P193