Reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hemodialysis patients

被引:78
作者
Peixoto, AJ
Santos, SFF
Mendes, RB
Crowley, ST
Maldonado, R
Orias, M
Mansoor, GA
White, WB
机构
[1] W Haven VA Med Ctr, Renal Sect 111F, W Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Gen Internal Med Sect, W Haven, CT 06516 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Nephrol Sect, W Haven, CT 06516 USA
[4] Univ Connecticut, Sch Med, Div Hypertens & Clin Pharmacol, Farmington, CT USA
[5] State Univ Rio de Janeiro, Div Nephrol, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[6] Hosp Privado Ctr Med Cordoba, Nephrol Sect, Cordoba, Argentina
[7] Catholic Univ Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure (BP); blood pressure (BP) monitoring; reproducibility; hypertension; hemodialysis (HD);
D O I
10.1053/ajkd.2000.19100
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has been increasingly used in hemodialysis (HD) practice and research; however, no study has evaluated the reproducibility of ABPM in this population. To address this question, we performed 48-hour interdialytic ABPM on 21 HD patients (mean age, 53 +/- 16 years; 7 women) on two different occasions 68 +/- 34 days (range, 30 to 154 days) apart. To qualify for the protocol, patients had to be at the same dry weight and on the same vasoactive drug regimen at both monitoring periods. BP was analyzed according to three different methods: isolated pre-HD and post-HD values, average pre-HD and post-HD values for the five HD sessions surrounding each monitoring period, and 48-hour interdialytic ABPM, Reproducibility was determined by analysis of the SD of the differences (SDD) between the two monitoring periods and the coefficient of variation of each method of BP determination. Our results show better reproducibility of ABPM (SDD, 10.6/6.6 mm Hg; coefficient of variation, 7.5%/8.1%) compared with isolated pre-HD BP (SDD, 24.4/11.3 mm Hg; coefficient of variation, 16.7%/14.1%) or post-HD BP (SDD, 16.8/14.5 mm Hg; coefficient of variation, 11.7%/17.8%), and averaged pre HD BP (SDD, 14.7/7.2 mm Hg; coefficient of variation, 10.1%/9.1%) or post-HD BP (SDD, 12.4/8.7 mm Hg; coefficient of variation, 8.9%/11.1%). The reproducibility of the decrease in BP during sleep was poor, with up to 43% of the subjects changing dipping category within or between interdialytic periods. We conclude that ABPM is the most accurate method to study BP in HD patients over time. However, variability is significant, and there is poor reproducibility of the nocturnal decline in BP. (C) 2000 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 990
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[2]   Influence of nycthemeral blood pressure pattern in treated hypertensive patients on hemodialysis [J].
Amar, J ;
Vernier, I ;
Rossignol, E ;
Lenfant, V ;
Conte, JJ ;
Chamontin, B .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 51 (06) :1863-1866
[3]   Seasonal changes in blood pressure in patients with end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis [J].
Argilés, A ;
Mourad, G ;
Mion, C .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (19) :1364-1370
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   SIESTA AND AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING - COMPARABILITY OF THE AFTERNOON NAP AND NIGHT SLEEP [J].
BURSZTYN, M ;
MEKLER, J ;
WACHTEL, N ;
BENISHAY, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1994, 7 (03) :217-221
[6]   HYPERTENSION IS NOT ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED IN HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS [J].
CHEIGH, JS ;
MILITE, C ;
SULLIVAN, JF ;
RUBIN, AL ;
STENZEL, KH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1992, 19 (05) :453-459
[7]  
CHUNG MYW, 1991, J HYPERTENS, V9, pS324
[8]  
Conlon PJ, 1996, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V7, P2658
[9]   Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in dialysis patients and estimation of mean interdialytic blood pressure [J].
Coomer, RW ;
Schulman, G ;
Breyer, JA ;
Shyr, Y .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1997, 29 (05) :678-684
[10]  
Covic A, 1999, J NEPHROL, V12, P220