How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults?

被引:352
作者
Tudor-Locke, C
Burkett, L
Reis, JP
Ainsworth, BE
Macera, CA
Wilson, DK
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ E, Dept Exercise & Wellness, Mesa, AZ 85212 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[3] San Diego State Univ, Dept Exercise & Nutr Sci, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[4] Univ S Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Prevent Res Ctr, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
walking; exercise; outcome assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.06.003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. The study purpose was to establish the number (and type) of days needed to estimate mean pedometer-determined steps/day in a field setting. Methods. Seven days of data were collected from 90 participants (33 males, age = 49.1 +/- 16.2 years, BMI = 27.2 +/- 4.1 kg/m(2); 57 females, age = 44.8 +/- 16.9 years, BMI = 27.0 +/- 5.9 kg/m(2)). Mean steps/day were computed for all 7 days (the criterion), each single day, and combinations of days. Analyses included repeated measures ANOVA, intra-class correlations (ICC), and regression. Results. There was a significant difference (P < 0.001) between days. The difference was limited to Sunday and accounted for 5% of the variance. ICC analyses indicated a minimum of 3 days is necessary to achieve a reliability of 0.80. The adjusted R-2 was 0.79 for a single day (specifically Wednesday), 0.89 for 2 days (Wednesday, Thursday), and 0.94 for 3 days (Wednesday, Thursday, Friday). Sunday was the last day to enter the model. Conclusions. Although there is a statistical difference between days, there is little practical difference, and the primary distinction appears limited to Sunday. Although a single day of collection is not acceptable, any 3 days can provide a sufficient estimate. (C) 2004 The Institute For Cancer Prevention and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
STOKES M, 1985, Physiotherapy Practice, V1, P71
[22]   Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed? [J].
Trost, SG ;
Pate, RR ;
Freedson, PS ;
Sallis, JF ;
Taylor, WC .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2000, 32 (02) :426-431
[23]   RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF PEDOMETER ACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS [J].
TRYON, WW ;
PINTO, LP ;
MORRISON, DF .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 1991, 13 (01) :27-44
[24]   Contribution of structured exercise class participation and informal walking for exercise to daily physical activity in community-dwelling older adults [J].
Tudor-Locke, C ;
Jones, GR ;
Myers, AM ;
Paterson, DH ;
Ecclestone, NA .
RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2002, 73 (03) :350-356
[25]   Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity - Convergent validity [J].
Tudor-Locke, C ;
Williams, JE ;
Reis, JP ;
Pluto, D .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 32 (12) :795-808
[26]   The relationship between pedometer-determined ambulatory activity and body composition variables [J].
Tudor-Locke, C ;
Ainsworth, BE ;
Whitt, MC ;
Thompson, RW ;
Addy, CL ;
Jones, DA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2001, 25 (11) :1571-1578
[27]  
Tudor-Locke CE, 2001, RES Q EXERCISE SPORT, V72, P1
[28]  
TUDORLOCKE C, IN PRESS FIELD METHO
[29]  
TUDORLOCKE C, IN PRESS ANN BEHAV M
[30]   Does reactivity exist in children when measuring activity levels with pedometers? [J].
Vincent, SD ;
Pangrazi, RP .
PEDIATRIC EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2002, 14 (01) :56-63