Reproducibility of skin prick test results in epidemiologic studies: a comparison of two devices

被引:24
作者
Illi, S
Garcia-Marcos, L
Hernando, V
Guillen, JJ
Liese, A
von Mutius, E
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Childrens Hosp, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[2] Inst Epidemiol, Munster, Germany
[3] Unidad Invest, Cartagena, Spain
关键词
reproducibility; skin prick test;
D O I
10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03905.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The reproducibility of skin prick tests under field conditions is essential for comparing prevalences between centers in epidemiologic multicenter studies. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the reproducibility of two widely used skin prick test devices: the Multi-Test and the ALK lancer. The subjects were 28 children, aged 6-14 years, with known sensitivities to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (D. pter.). Both devices were applied to each subject on two occasions, 1 week apart, by different, randomly assigned fieldworkers, using histamine, negative control, and the D. pter. allergen extract. For all three tested solutions, mean wheal sizes were larger for the Multi-Test than for the ALK lancet. The coefficient of variation for histamine was 21.8% for the Multi-Test and 17.3% for the ALK lancet. The coefficients of variation for the allergen D. pter, amounted to 47.4% for the Multi-Test and to 24.6% for the ALK lancet. The percentage of concordant test results was 92.6% for the Multi-Test and 100.0% for the ALK lancet for a cutoff point of wheal size equal to or greater than 1 mm. The results of this study suggest that the single ALK lancet performs slightly better than the Multi-Test device with respect to reproducibility under conditions of epidemiologic field studies.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 358
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] A COMPARISON OF 6 EPICUTANEOUS DEVICES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITIVITY SKIN TESTING
    ADINOFF, AD
    ROSLONIEC, DM
    MCCALL, LL
    NELSON, HS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1989, 84 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [2] STANDARDIZATION OF THE PRICK TEST - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 3 METHODS
    BASOMBA, A
    SASTRE, A
    PELAEZ, A
    ROMAR, A
    CAMPOS, A
    GARCIAVILLALMANZO, A
    [J]. ALLERGY, 1985, 40 (06) : 395 - 399
  • [3] EVALUATION OF THE MULTITEST DEVICE FOR IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITIVITY SKIN TESTING
    BERKOWITZ, RB
    TINKELMAN, DG
    LUTZ, C
    CRUMMIE, A
    SMITH, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1992, 90 (06) : 979 - 985
  • [4] BRAUNFAHRLANDER C, 1995, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V151, pA565
  • [5] Measuring atopy in a multi-centre epidemiological study
    Chinn, S
    Jarvis, D
    Luczynska, CM
    Lai, E
    Burney, PGJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 12 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [6] PRECISION OF SKIN PRICK AND PUNCTURE TESTS WITH 9 METHODS
    DEMOLY, P
    BOUSQUET, J
    MANDERSCHEID, JC
    DREBORG, S
    DHIVERT, H
    MICHEL, FB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1991, 88 (05) : 758 - 762
  • [7] Dreborg S, 1989, ALLERGY S10, V44, P1
  • [8] COMPARISON OF THE SENSITIVITY AND PRECISION OF 4 SKIN-TEST DEVICES
    ENGLER, DB
    DEJARNATT, AC
    SIM, TC
    LEE, JL
    GRANT, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1992, 90 (06) : 985 - 991
  • [9] MAHAN C, 1993, ANN ALLERGY, V71, P25
  • [10] MENARDO JL, 1982, ANN ALLERGY, V48, P235