Endometrial contraception: modulation of molecular determinants of uterine receptivity

Modulation of endometrial receptivity is a promising approach for fertility regulation since it allows a contraceptive to act specifically at the endometrium. This was corroborated by our previous observations that treatment with low doses of a pure progesterone antagonist (PA, antiprogestin), onapristone (ZK 98299), in bonnet monkeys inhibited fertility by selectively retarding endometrial development, without affecting the hypophyseal-hypothalamic function. In the present study, further investigations, undertaken to analyze the molecular repertoire of a nonreceptive primate endometrium, determined expression of: steroid hormone receptors, i.e. progesterone receptor (PR) and estrogen receptor (ER); cytokines, i.e. leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF): transforming growth factor beta (TGF beta) and its receptor (TGF betaR); and cell adhesion molecules, i.e, integrins (alpha (v)beta (3), alpha (1)beta (1)). These studies were conducted during the different phases of the normal menstrual cycle and following treatment with different doses of onapristone (2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg every third day for one cycle) in bonnet monkeys. The molecules were analysed collectively to explore the possibility of a correlation between expression of these markers and endometrial receptivity and to investigate whether there exists a regulatory link between expression of these molecules under in vivo conditions. Three types of expression patterns of endometrial factors were observed during the peri-implantation period following onapristone treat-ment: 1) LIF, alpha (v)beta (3), and alpha (1)beta (1) showed significant (P < 0.02) down regulation in glandular epithelium of endometria in animals treated with all three doses of onapristone as compared to the control group. This was indicative of their critical role in the progesterone-driven cascade leading to implantation. 2) PR, TGF<beta>, and TGF betaR remained unaffected in the endometria from 2.5 mg treated animals and showed down regulation in animals treated with 5 and 10 mg onapristone as compared to the control group, thereby suggesting that the expression of these markers may not truely reflect endometrial receptivity per se. However, their facilitatory role in preparing the endometrium for implantation can not be ruled out since continued perturbation in the expression of these molecules may affect endometrial growth, remodelling, and differentiation, which in turn may render the endometrium nonreceptive; 3) ER remained unaltered in endometria of animals rendered infertile with 2.5, 5, and LO mg onapristone. This observation indirectly suggests that onapristone-induced endometrial changes are mediated via some specific mechanisms. The present study clearly demonstrates that endometrial non-receptivity induced at low doses of onapristone is associated with changes in the expression pattern of specific molecular markers. However, no direct correlation was observed between in vivo expression of TGF beta, LIF, and integrins, thereby lending support to the concept that there exists redundancy or multiple pathways which regulate implantation events. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Inc.