Age Differences in Affective Decision Making as Indexed by Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task

被引:346
作者
Cauffman, Elizabeth [1 ]
Shulman, Elizabeth P.
Steinberg, Laurence [2 ]
Claus, Eric [3 ]
Banich, Marie T. [3 ]
Graham, Sandra [4 ]
Woolard, Jennifer [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Psychol & Social Behav, Sch Social Ecol, Irvine, CA 92687 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Cognit Psychol & Cognit Neurosci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Educ, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Georgetown Univ, Dept Psychol, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
decision making; risk taking; adolescent development; reward sensitivity; avoidance behavior; SOMATIC MARKER HYPOTHESIS; RISK-TAKING; FUTURE CONSEQUENCES; ADOLESCENCE; BRAIN; BEHAVIOR; ADULTS; INSENSITIVITY; IMPULSIVITY; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1037/a0016128
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Contemporary perspectives on age differences in risk taking, informed by advances in developmental neuroscience, have emphasized the need to examine the ways in which emotional and cognitive factors interact to influence decision making. In the present study, a diverse sample of 901 individuals between the ages of 10 and 30 were administered a modified version of the Iowa Gambling Task, which is designed to measure affective decision making. Results indicate that approach behaviors (operationalized as the tendency to play increasingly from the advantageous decks over the course of the task) display an inverted U-shape relation to age, peaking in mid- to late adolescence. In contrast, avoidance behaviors (operationalized as the tendency to refrain from playing from the disadvantageous decks) increase linearly with age, with adults avoiding disadvantageous decks at higher rates than both preadolescents and adolescents. The finding that adolescents, compared to adults, are relatively more approach oriented in response to positive feedback and less avoidant in response to negative feedback is consistent with recent studies of brain development, as well as epidemiological data on various types of risky behavior, and may have important practical implications for the prevention of adolescent risk taking.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 207
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
[11]   Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex [J].
Cardinal, RN ;
Parkinson, JA ;
Hall, J ;
Everitt, BJ .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2002, 26 (03) :321-352
[12]  
Casey BJ, 2008, DEV REV, V28, P62, DOI [10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.003, 10.1196/annals.1440.010]
[13]   (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults [J].
Cauffman, E ;
Steinberg, L .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2000, 18 (06) :741-760
[14]  
Cauffman E., 2000, YOUTH TRIAL, P325
[15]   Characterization of children's decision making: Sensitivity to punishment frequency, not task complexity [J].
Crone, EA ;
Bunge, SA ;
Latenstein, H ;
van der Molen, MW .
CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 11 (03) :245-263
[16]   Developmental changes in real life decision making: Performance on a gambling task previously shown to depend on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex [J].
Crone, EA ;
van der Molen, MW .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 25 (03) :251-279
[17]   Decision-making in disinhibited adolescents and adults: insensitivity to future consequences or driven by immediate reward? [J].
Crone, EA ;
Vendel, I ;
van der Molen, MW .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2003, 35 (07) :1625-1641
[18]  
Damasio AR., 1994, Descartes' error: emotion, reason and the human brain
[19]   Tracking the hemodynamic responses to reward and punishment in the striatum [J].
Delgado, MR ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Fissell, C ;
Noll, DC ;
Fiez, JA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 84 (06) :3072-3077
[20]   The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation [J].
Dunn, BD ;
Dalgleish, T ;
Lawrence, AD .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2006, 30 (02) :239-271