Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals

被引:285
作者
Pawlowski, SD
Robey, D
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Informat Syst & Decis Sci Dept, EJ Ourso Coll Business Adm, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Comp Informat Syst Dept, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, Atlanta, GA 30302 USA
关键词
boundary spanning; organizational; communication; organizational learning; IS skill requirements; IT professionals; knowledge broker; internal knowledge transfer;
D O I
10.2307/25148658
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This interpretive case study examines knowledge brokering as an aspect of the work of information technology professionals. The purpose of this exploratory study is to understand knowledge brokering from the perspective of IT professionals as they reflect upon their work practice. As knowledge brokers, IT professionals see themselves as facilitating the flow of knowledge about both IT and business practices across the boundaries that separate work units within organizations. A qualitative analysis of interviews conducted with 23 IT professionals and business users in a large manufacturing and distribution company is summarized in a conceptual framework showing the conditions, practices, and consequences of knowledge brokering by IT professionals. The framework suggests that brokering practices are conditioned by structural conditions, including decentralization and a federated IT management organization, and by technical conditions, specifically shared IT systems that serve as boundary objects. Brokering practices include gaining permission to cross organizational boundaries, surfacing and challenging assumptions made by IT users, translation and interpretation, and relinquishing ownership of knowledge. Consequences of brokering are the transfer of both business and IT knowledge across units in the organization.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 672
页数:28
相关论文
共 79 条
[61]   Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies [J].
Sambamurthy, V ;
Zmud, RW .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1999, 23 (02) :261-290
[62]   REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY SPANNING ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIP [J].
SCHWAB, RC ;
UNGSON, GR ;
BROWN, WB .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1985, 11 (01) :75-86
[63]  
Silverman David., 2001, Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text, and Interaction, V2nd
[64]  
SPENDER JC, 1996, ORG LEARNING COMPETI, P56, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446250228.N4
[65]  
Stake R.E., 1998, Strategies of qualitative inquiry
[66]  
Star S.L., 1989, Distributed artificial intelligence, P37, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-1-55860-092-8.50006-X
[67]   INSTITUTIONAL ECOLOGY, TRANSLATIONS AND BOUNDARY OBJECTS - AMATEURS AND PROFESSIONALS IN BERKELEYS-MUSEUM-OF-VERTEBRATE-ZOOLOGY, 1907-39 [J].
STAR, SL ;
GRIESEMER, JR .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 1989, 19 (03) :387-420
[68]  
STAR SL, 1997, TRANSPARENCY DIFFERE
[69]   Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm [J].
Szulanski, G .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :27-43
[70]  
TURNER RH, 1968, INT ENCYCL SOC SCI, V13, P552