The effect of osteoprotegerin administration on the intra-tibial cyrowth of the osteoblastic LuCaP 23.1 prostate cancer xenograft

被引:37
作者
Kiefer, JA
Vessella, RL
Quinn, JE
Odman, AM
Zhang, J
Keller, ET
Kostenuik, P
Dunstan, CR
Corey, E
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Pathol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
bone metastases; bone remodeling; osteoblast; osteoprotegerin; prostate cancer; PSA;
D O I
10.1007/s10585-004-2869-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Osteoprotegerin (OPG) plays a central role in controlling bone resorption. Exogenous administration of OPG has been shown to be effective ill preventing osteolysis and limiting the growth of osteolytic metastasis. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of OPG on osteoblastic prostate cancer (CaP) metastases in an animal model. LuCaP 23.1 cells were injected intra-tibially and Fc-OPG (6.0 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously three times a week starting either 24 hours prior to cell injection (prevention reopmen) or at 4 post-injection (treatment regimen). Changes in bone mineral density at the tumor site were determined by dual x-ray absorptiometry. Tumor growth was monitored by evaluating serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). FcOPG did not inhibit establishment of osteoblastic bone lesions of LuCaP 23.1. but it decreased growth of the tumor cells, as determined by decreases in serum PSA levels of 73.0 +/- 44.3% (P < 0.001) and 78.3 +/- 25.3% (P < 0.001) under the treatment and prevention regimens. respectively, compared to the untreated tumor-bearing animals. Administration of Fc-OPG decreased the proliferative index by 33.0% (P = 0.1838) in the treatment group. and 75.2% (P = 0.0358) in the prevention group. The results of this study suggest a potential role for OPG in the treatment of established osteoblastic CaP bone metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 387
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   Osteoprotegerin inhibits the development of osteolytic bone disease in multiple myeloma [J].
Croucher, PI ;
Shipman, CM ;
Lippitt, J ;
Perry, M ;
Asosingh, K ;
Hijzen, A ;
Brabbs, AC ;
van Beek, EJR ;
Holen, I ;
Skerry, TM ;
Dunstan, CR ;
Russell, GR ;
Van Camp, B ;
Vanderkerken, K .
BLOOD, 2001, 98 (13) :3534-3540
[12]  
Ellis WJ, 1996, CLIN CANCER RES, V2, P1039
[13]  
Goltzman D, 1997, CANCER, V80, P1581, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971015)80:8+<1581::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO
[14]  
2-N
[15]  
Goltzman David, 2000, Cancer, V88, P2903, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12+<2903::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO
[16]  
2-G
[17]  
HAUSCHKA PV, 1986, J BIOL CHEM, V261, P2665
[18]  
HEANEY RP, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P1515
[19]  
Hofbauer LC, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V92, P460, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010801)92:3<460::AID-CNCR1344>3.0.CO
[20]  
2-D