Contrast sensitivity in subgroups of developmental dyslexia

被引:64
作者
Williams, MJ [1 ]
Stuart, GW
Castles, A
McAnally, KI
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Psychol, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] St Georges Hlth Serv, Kew, Vic 3101, Australia
[3] Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Ctr Cognit Sci, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
dyslexia; magnocell; parvocell; contrast sensitivity;
D O I
10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00573-4
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
It has been proposed that developmental dyslexia is associated with a deficit in the magnocellular pathway of the visual system. Other research focuses upon the heterogeneous nature of developmental dyslexia, and evidence that subgroups of dyslexia may be identified based on selective deficits in specific component reading skills. This study tested the hypothesis that visual processing deficits may be present in different subgroups of developmental dyslexia by comparing the visual contrast sensitivity of three subgroups of dyslexic children (phonological, surface and mixed) and controls. The stimulus designed to measure magnocellular visual function was a low spatial frequency Gaussian blob, flickered sinusoidally at a temporal frequency of 8.33 Hz. The control stimulus, designed to measure parvocellular visual function, was a relatively high spatial frequency Gaussian windowed grating (8 c/deg) slowly ramped on and off. There were no significant differences between the groups of dyslexic and control children in contrast sensitivity to either stimulus. The findings do not support the existence of a magnocellular system deficit in dyslexia. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 477
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
[31]   PHYSIOLOGICAL AND ANATOMICAL EVIDENCE FOR A MAGNOCELLULAR DEFECT IN DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA [J].
LIVINGSTONE, MS ;
ROSEN, GD ;
DRISLANE, FW ;
GALABURDA, AM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1991, 88 (18) :7943-7947
[32]   Dyslexia and a transient/magnocellular pathway deficit: The current situation and future directions [J].
Lovegrove, B .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 48 (03) :167-171
[33]   CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FUNCTIONS AND SPECIFIC READING-DISABILITY [J].
LOVEGROVE, W ;
MARTIN, F ;
BOWLING, A ;
BLACKWOOD, M ;
BADCOCK, D ;
PAXTON, S .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1982, 20 (03) :309-315
[34]   SPECIFIC READING-DISABILITY - DIFFERENCES IN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AS A FUNCTION OF SPATIAL-FREQUENCY [J].
LOVEGROVE, WJ ;
BOWLING, A ;
BADCOCK, D ;
BLACKWOOD, M .
SCIENCE, 1980, 210 (4468) :439-440
[35]   On the bases of two subtypes of development dyslexia [J].
Manis, FR ;
Seidenberg, MS ;
Doi, LM ;
McBrideChang, C ;
Petersen, A .
COGNITION, 1996, 58 (02) :157-195
[36]   THE EFFECTS OF FIELD SIZE AND LUMINANCE ON CONTRAST SENSITIVITY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SPECIFICALLY READING DISABLED AND NORMAL-CHILDREN [J].
MARTIN, F ;
LOVEGROVE, W .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1984, 22 (01) :73-77
[37]   UNIFORM-FIELD FLICKER MASKING IN CONTROL AND SPECIFICALLY-DISABLED READERS [J].
MARTIN, F ;
LOVEGROVE, WJ .
PERCEPTION, 1988, 17 (02) :203-214
[39]  
MERIGAN WH, 1991, J NEUROSCI, V11, P994
[40]   HOW PARALLEL ARE THE PRIMATE VISUAL PATHWAYS [J].
MERIGAN, WH ;
MAUNSELL, JHR .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 16 :369-402