Performance metrics in supply chain management

被引:174
作者
Kleijnen, JPC [1 ]
Smits, MT [1 ]
机构
[1] UVT, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
supply chain; logistics; performance measurement; balanced scorecard; simulation; system dynamics;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601539
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This survey paper starts with a critical analysis of various performance metrics for supply chain management (SCM), used by a specific manufacturing company. Then it summarizes how economic theory treats multiple performance metrics. Actually. the paper proposes to deal with multiple metrics in SCM via the balanced scorecard - which measures customers. internal processes, innovations, and finance. To forecast how the values of these metrics will change - once a supply chain is redesigned - simulation may be used. This paper distinguishes four simulation types for S M: (i) spreadsheet simulation. (ii) system dynamics, (iii) discrete-event simulation, and (iv) business games. These simulation types may explain the bullwhip effect, predict fill rate values, and educate and train users. Validation of simulation models requires sensitivity analysis; a statistical methodology is proposed. The paper concludes with suggestions for a possible research agenda in SCM. A list with 50 references for further study is included.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 514
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   EXPERIMENTS, QUASI-EXPERIMENTS, AND CASE-STUDIES - A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL-METHODS FOR EVALUATING DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS [J].
ADELMAN, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1991, 21 (02) :293-301
[2]  
Angerhofer BJ, 2000, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2000 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, P342, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2000.899737
[3]  
Angüm E, 2002, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2002 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, P377, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2002.1172907
[4]  
[Anonymous], SENSITIVITY ANAL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ORMS TODAY
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, QUANTITATIVE MODELS
[7]   Global business process re-engineering: a system dynamics-based approach [J].
Ashayeri, J ;
Keij, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 1998, 18 (9-10) :817-+
[8]  
ASHAYERI J, 2001, STATOR, V2, P15
[9]   Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods [J].
Beamon, BM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1998, 55 (03) :281-294
[10]  
BETTONVIL B, 2003, ROBUST SOLUQTIONS SU