Psychological, behavioral, and immune changes after a psychological intervention: A clinical trial

被引:289
作者
Andersen, BL
Farrar, WB
Golden-Kreutz, DM
Glaser, R
Emery, CF
Crespin, TR
Shapiro, CL
Carson, WE
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Mol Virol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Immunol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Dept Med Genet, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[6] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Med Oncol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[7] Ohio State Univ, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[8] Primetr Inc, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2004.06.030
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose This randomized clinical trial tests the hypothesis that a psychological intervention can reduce emotional distress, improve health behaviors and dose-intensity, and enhance immune responses. Patients and Methods We studied 227 women who were surgically treated for regional breast cancer. Before adjuvant therapy, women completed interviews and questionnaires assessing emotional distress, social adjustment, and health behaviors. A 60-mL blood sample was drawn for immune assays. Patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or assessment only group. The intervention was conducted in small patient groups, with one session per week for 4 months. The sessions included strategies to reduce stress, improve mood, alter health behaviors, and maintain adherence to cancer treatment and care. Reassessment occurred after completion of the intervention. Results As predicted, patients receiving the intervention showed significant lowering of anxiety, improvements in perceived social support, improved dietary habits, and reduction in smoking (all P < .05). Analyses of adjuvant chemotherapy dose-intensity revealed significantly more variability (ie, more dispersion in the dose-intensity values) for the assessment arm (P < .05). Immune responses for the intervention patients paralleled their psychological and behavioral improvements. T-cell proliferation in response to phytohemagglutinin and concanavalin A remained stable or increased for the Intervention patients, whereas both responses declined for Assessment patients; this effect was replicated across three concentrations for each assay (all P < .01). Conclusion These data show a convergence of significant psychological, health behavior, and biologic effects after a psychological intervention for cancer patients. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:3570 / 3580
页数:11
相关论文
共 96 条
[31]  
Fiore MC., 2000, TREATING TOBACCO USE
[32]  
GIRDEN ER, 1992, ANOVA REPEARED MESU, P1
[33]   The effect of group psychosocial support on survival in metastatic breast cancer. [J].
Goodwin, PJ ;
Leszcz, M ;
Ennis, M ;
Koopmans, J ;
Vincent, L ;
Guther, H ;
Drysdale, E ;
Hundleby, M ;
Chochinov, HM ;
Navarro, M ;
Speca, M ;
Hunter, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (24) :1719-1726
[34]  
GRITZ ER, 1993, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V2, P261
[35]   IMMUNOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS TO BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS [J].
GRUBER, BL ;
HERSH, SP ;
HALL, NRS ;
WALETZKY, LR ;
KUNZ, JF ;
CARPENTER, JK ;
KVERNO, KS ;
WEISS, SM .
BIOFEEDBACK AND SELF-REGULATION, 1993, 18 (01) :1-22
[36]  
Hazuda H.P., 1994, SOCIAL SUPPORT CARDI, P119
[37]   Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research [J].
Helgeson, VS ;
Cohen, S .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 15 (02) :135-148
[38]   Group support interventions for women with breast cancer: Who benefits from what? [J].
Helgeson, VS ;
Cohen, S ;
Schulz, R ;
Yasko, J .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (02) :107-114
[39]   IMPACT OF EVENT SCALE - MEASURE OF SUBJECTIVE STRESS [J].
HOROWITZ, M ;
WILNER, N ;
ALVAREZ, W .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1979, 41 (03) :209-218
[40]  
Hosaka Takashi, 2000, Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, V25, P183