Evolutionary responses of the life history of wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster to two standard methods of laboratory culture

被引:161
作者
Sgrò, CM [1 ]
Partridge, L [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Biol, London NW1 2HE, England
关键词
life history; Drosophila; laboratory culture; natural selection; mutation accumulation; genetic correlation;
D O I
10.1086/303394
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Genetic adaptation of wild populations to captivity can be a problem for studies of evolution and for programs of conservation and biological control. We examine how the life history of Drosophila melanogaster, the most commonly used organism for laboratory studies of evolution, evolves in response to two common methods of laboratory culture: in bottles and in population cages. We collected flies at the same site in nature at the same time of year in three consecutive years and compared freshly collected populations from the third collection with the products of 1 or 2 yr's laboratory culture, in a replicated experimental design. Preadult development time increased in the laboratory, particularly in cage culture. There was also an increase in larval competitive ability in both types of culture. Body size was little affected, increasing slightly and only in the bottle culture. Early fecundity increased in bottle culture, while late fecundity declined. Adult mortality rates were lowest in the fresh collections and showed a marked and progressive increase in bottle culture with a slight increase in population cage culture and apparently only in the first year of culture. Remating frequency increased in bottle but not cage culture. These evolutionary changes are most likely explained by increased larval competition in laboratory culture, especially in population cages, and by truncation of the adult period in the bottle culture, resulting in natural selection acting solely on the early part of the adult period.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 353
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1957, EVOLUTION
[2]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS T ROY SOC B
[3]   COMPARISON OF THE REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES OF DOMESTIC SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA [J].
ATKINSON, WD .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1979, 48 (01) :53-64
[4]  
BOLLER EF, 1984, Z ANGEW ENTOMOL, V98, P1
[5]   REMATING AND MALE-DERIVED NUTRIENTS IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
CHAPMAN, T ;
TREVITT, S ;
PARTRIDGE, L .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1994, 7 (01) :51-69
[6]   COST OF MATING IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER FEMALES IS MEDIATED BY MALE ACCESSORY-GLAND PRODUCTS [J].
CHAPMAN, T ;
LIDDLE, LF ;
KALB, JM ;
WOLFNER, MF ;
PARTRIDGE, L .
NATURE, 1995, 373 (6511) :241-244
[7]   Age-specific inbreeding depression and components of genetic variance in relation to the evolution of senescence [J].
Charlesworth, B ;
Hughes, KA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (12) :6140-6145
[8]   DEMOGRAPHY OF GENOTYPES - FAILURE OF THE LIMITED LIFE-SPAN PARADIGM IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
CURTSINGER, JW ;
FUKUI, HH ;
TOWNSEND, DR ;
VAUPEL, JW .
SCIENCE, 1992, 258 (5081) :461-463
[9]   A COST OF MATING IN FEMALE FRUIT-FLIES [J].
FOWLER, K ;
PARTRIDGE, L .
NATURE, 1989, 338 (6218) :760-761
[10]   MODELING PROBLEMS IN CONSERVATION GENETICS USING CAPTIVE DROSOPHILA POPULATIONS - RAPID GENETIC ADAPTATION TO CAPTIVITY [J].
FRANKHAM, R ;
LOEBEL, DA .
ZOO BIOLOGY, 1992, 11 (05) :333-342