Percutaneous thermocoagulation intradiscal techniques for discogenic low back pain

被引:58
作者
Urrutia, Gerard
Kovacs, Francisco
Nishishinya, Maria Betina
Olabe, Javier
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Ctr Cochrane Ibeoamer, Serv Epidemiol & Salut Publ, Hosp Sant Creu & Sant Pau, Barcelona 08041, Spain
[2] Fdn Kovacs, Dept Cientif, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
[3] Clin Juaneda, Red Espanola Invest Dolencias Espalda, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
[4] Clin Juaneda, Serv Neurocirugia, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
关键词
intradiscal electrothermal therapy; percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation; low back pain; systematic review; clinical trial;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000261492.55121.93
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Systematic review. Objective. To systematically review the evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of percutaneous thermocoagulation intradiscal techniques for discogenic low back pain. Summary of Background Data. The intervertebral disc is thought to be the source of pain in a relevant proportion of cases of low back pain (LBP). Two percutaneous thermocoagulation intradiscal techniques have been described to treat discogenic LBP: percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation (PIRFT) and intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET). Methods. An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases up to 2005, to identify nonrandomized controlled trials and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on those techniques. All relevant studies were methodologically assessed independently by 3 reviewers. RCTs were assessed following the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Back Review Group. A qualitative synthesis of results was performed. Results. Six studies were included with a total of 283 patients. Two open, nonrandomized trials ( 95 patients) showed positive results for IDET compared with rehabilitation and PIRFT. Results from 2 RCTs showed no differences between PIRFT and placebo, and between different PIRFT techniques. Two RCTs compared IDET with placebo. One suggested differences only in pain and in disability, while the best quality RCT showed no differences. Conclusions. The available evidence does not support the efficacy or effectiveness of percutaneous thermocoagulation intradiscal techniques for the treatment of discogenic low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:1146 / 1154
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[51]   Interobserver reliability of detecting lumbar intervertebral disc high-intensity zone on magnetic resonance imaging and association of high-intensity zone with pain and anular disruption [J].
Smith, BMT ;
Hurwitz, EL ;
Solsberg, D ;
Rubinstein, D ;
Corenman, DS ;
Dwyer, AP ;
Kleiner, J .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (19) :2074-2080
[52]   Pain and function after intradiscal electrothermal treatment (IDET) for symptomatic lumbar disc degeneration [J].
Spruit, M ;
Jacobs, WCH .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2002, 11 (06) :589-593
[53]  
URRUTIA G, 2004, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[54]   Vibration pain provocation can improve the specificity of MRI in the diagnosis of symptomatic lumbar disc rupture [J].
Vanharanta, H ;
Ohnmeiss, DD ;
Aprill, CN .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1998, 14 (03) :239-247
[55]   Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration back review group for spinal disorders [J].
vanTulder, MW ;
Assendelft, WJJ ;
Koes, BW ;
Bouter, LM .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (20) :2323-2330
[56]   THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .1. CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION [J].
WARE, JE ;
SHERBOURNE, CD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (06) :473-483
[57]   The profit motive and spine surgery [J].
Weiner, BK ;
Levi, BH .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (22) :2588-2591
[58]   Cauda equina syndrome from intradiscal electrothermal therapy [J].
Wetzel, FT .
NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (11) :1607-1607