Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Ameliorates Chronic Pain and Reduces Short Intracortical Inhibition

被引:248
作者
Antal, Andrea [1 ]
Terney, Daniella [1 ]
Kuehnl, Stefanie [1 ]
Paulus, Walter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Chronic pain; tDCS; TMS; motor cortex stimulation; intracortical inhibition; CHRONIC NEUROPATHIC PAIN; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; NEURONAL-ACTIVITY; DC-STIMULATION; EXCITABILITY; HUMANS; ORIGIN; RELIEF; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.023
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Consecutive sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) may be a suitable therapy to treat chronic pain, as it can modulate neural activities in the stimulated and interconnected regions. Objectives. The present study investigated the analgesic effect of five consecutive days of anodal/sham tDCS using subjective (visual analog scale [VAS]) and objective (cortical excitability measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation [TMS]) measurements. Methods. Patients with therapy-resistant chronic pain syndromes (trigeminal neuralgia, poststroke pain syndrome, back pain, fibromyalgia) participated. As this clinical trial was an exploratory study, statistical analyses implemented exploratory methods. Twelve patients, who underwent both anodal and sham tDCS, were analyzed using a crossover design. An additional nine patients had only anodal or sham stimulation. tDCS was applied over the hand area of the M1 for 20 minutes, at 1 mA for five consecutive days, using a randomized, double-blind design. Pain was assessed daily using a VAS rating for one month before, during, and one month post-stimulation. M1 excitability was determined using paired-pulse TMS. Results. Anodal tDCS led to a greater improvement in VAS ratings than sham tDCS, evident even three to four weeks post-treatment. Decreased intracortical inhibition was demonstrated after anodal stimulation, indicating changes in cortico-cortical excitability. No patient experienced severe adverse effects; seven patients suffered from light headache after anodal and six after sham stimulation. Conclusion. Results confirm that five daily sessions of tDCS over the hand area of the M1 can produce long-lasting pain relief in patients with chronic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;39:890-903. (C) 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:890 / 903
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex
    Nitsche, MA
    Seeber, A
    Frommann, K
    Mein, CC
    Rochford, C
    Nitsche, MS
    Fricke, K
    Liebetanz, D
    Lang, N
    Antal, A
    Paulus, W
    Tergau, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2005, 568 (01): : 291 - 303
  • [22] Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Cohen, Leonardo G.
    Wassermann, Eric M.
    Priori, Alberto
    Lang, Nicolas
    Antal, Andrea
    Paulus, Walter
    Hummel, Friedhelm
    Boggio, Paulo S.
    Fregni, Felipe
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (03) : 206 - 223
  • [23] Motor cortex stimulation for refractory neuropathic pain: Four year outcome and predictors of efficacy
    Nuti, C
    Peyron, R
    Garcia-Larrea, L
    Brunon, J
    Laurent, B
    Sindou, M
    Mertens, P
    [J]. PAIN, 2005, 118 (1-2) : 43 - 52
  • [24] State of the art: Pharmacologic effects on cortical excitability measures tested by transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Paulus, Walter
    Classen, Joseph
    Cohen, Leonardo G.
    Large, Charles H.
    Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo
    Nitsche, Michael
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Rosenow, F.
    Rothwell, John C.
    Ziemann, Ulf
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (03) : 151 - 163
  • [25] Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients
    Poreisz, Csaba
    Boros, Klara
    Antal, Andrea
    Paulus, Walter
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2007, 72 (4-6) : 208 - 214
  • [26] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain -: A pilot study
    Rollnik, JD
    Wüstefeld, S
    Däuper, J
    Karst, M
    Fink, M
    Kossev, A
    Dengler, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2002, 48 (01) : 6 - 10
  • [27] Rothwell J C, 1999, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl, V52, P97
  • [28] Improvement in the placebo group could be due to regression to the mean as well as to sociobiologic factors
    Rück, A
    Sylvén, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 97 (01) : 152 - +
  • [29] Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex influences the neuronal activity of subthalamic nucleus
    Strafella, AP
    Vanderwerf, Y
    Sadikot, AF
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 20 (08) : 2245 - 2249
  • [30] CHRONIC MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION IN PATIENTS WITH THALAMIC PAIN
    TSUBOKAWA, T
    KATAYAMA, Y
    YAMAMOTO, T
    HIRAYAMA, T
    KOYAMA, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1993, 78 (03) : 393 - 401