Measurement of ammonia emissions using various techniques in a comparative tunnel study

被引:37
作者
Emmenegger, L [1 ]
Mohn, J
Sigrist, M
Marinov, D
Steinemann, U
Zumsteg, F
Meier, M
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Labs Mat Testing & Res, Air Pollut Environm Technol Lab, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[2] ETH, Laser Spect & Sensing Lab, Inst Quantum Elect, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] US & FZ Beratende Ingn, CH-8832 Wollerau, Switzerland
[4] OSTLUFT, AWEL, Abt Lufthyg, CH-8090 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
ammonia; automotive emission; emission factor; heavy-duty vehicle; light-duty vehicle; tunnel study;
D O I
10.1504/IJEP.2004.005547
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A field-based intercomparison study for ammonia measurements was conducted using seven analytical methods. It included sulphuric acid impinger, citric acid denuder, differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS), and continuous aqueous extraction followed by measurement of conductivity (Airrmonia). Measurements were done at the entrance and the exit of the Gubrist highway tunnel near Zurich, Switzerland. For DOAS, FTIR, PAS and Airrmonia, 24 hour means were calculated based on a time resolution of 10 minutes. At the tunnel exit, all 24 hour averages were within 13%, and the continuous data of the time-resolved methods agreed well. At the tunnel entrance, a slightly reduced method comparison included four methods, and daily mean values agreed within 23%. Ammonia emission factors, based on 4 weeks of continuous measurements with the Airrmonia, were 31 +/- 4 mg km(-1) for light-duty vehicles and 14 +/- 7 mg km(-1) for heavy-duty vehicles.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 341
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]   Effects of adsorption-desorption processes on the response time and accuracy of photoacoustic detection of ammonia [J].
Schmohl, A ;
Miklos, A ;
Hess, P .
APPLIED OPTICS, 2001, 40 (15) :2571-2578
[32]   EMISSION FACTORS FROM ROAD TRAFFIC FROM A TUNNEL STUDY (GUBRIST TUNNEL, SWITZERLAND) .1. CONCEPT AND FIRST RESULTS [J].
STAEHELIN, J ;
SCHLAPFER, K ;
BURGIN, T ;
STEINEMANN, U ;
SCHNEIDER, S ;
BRUNNER, D ;
BAUMLE, M ;
MEIER, M ;
ZAHNER, C ;
KEISER, S ;
STAHEL, W ;
KELLER, C .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 169 (1-3) :141-147
[33]  
Staehelin J, 1997, ENVIRONMETRICS, V8, P219, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(199705)8:3<219::AID-ENV254>3.0.CO
[34]  
2-M
[35]  
STEINEMANN U, 2003, VERKEHRS SCHADSTOFFM, P45
[36]   Ammonia emissions from non-agricultural sources in the UK [J].
Sutton, MA ;
Dragosits, U ;
Tang, YS ;
Fowler, D .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 34 (06) :855-869
[37]  
Warneck P, 2000, CHEM NATURAL ATMOSPH
[38]   AN INTERCOMPARISON OF 5 AMMONIA MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES [J].
WILLIAMS, EJ ;
SANDHOLM, ST ;
BRADSHAW, JD ;
SCHENDEL, JS ;
LANGFORD, AO ;
QUINN, PK ;
LEBEL, PJ ;
VAY, SA ;
ROBERTS, PD ;
NORTON, RB ;
WATKINS, BA ;
BUHR, MP ;
PARRISH, DD ;
CALVERT, JG ;
FEHSENFELD, FC .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1992, 97 (D11) :11591-11611