0.125% ropivacaine is similar to 0.125% bupivacaine for labor analgesia using patient-controlled epidural infusion

被引:92
作者
Owen, MD [1 ]
D'Angelo, R [1 ]
Gerancher, JC [1 ]
Thompson, JM [1 ]
Foss, ML [1 ]
Babb, JD [1 ]
Eisenach, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199803000-00015
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We compared the effects of 0.125% ropivacaine with 0.125% bupivacaine in laboring patients using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Fifty-one ASA physical status I or II term parturients with functioning epidural catheters were randomized to receive ropivacaine or bupivacaine using a prospective, double-blind design. Basal infusions (6 mL/h) were supplemented with patient-controlled boluses (5 mt) every 10 min as required. For inadequate analgesia, patients were administered 10-mL boluses of study solution until comfortable. There were no differences in verbal pain scores, amount of local anesthetics used, sensory levels, motor blockade, labor duration, mode of delivery, side effects, or patient satisfaction between the two local anesthetics. We conclude that 0.125% ropivacaine and bupivacaine are clinically indistinguishable and are both highly effective for labor analgesia using PCEA. Implications: This study compared labor analgesia from 0.125% ropivacaine and 0.125% bupivacaine using patient-controlled epidural analgesia. We found no significant differences in local anesthetic use, analgesic characteristics, or side effects between 0.125% ropivacaine and 0.125% bupivacaine. We conclude that these two drugs are clinically indistinguishable at this concentration.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 531
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   THE EFFECTS OF EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE FOR CESAREAN-SECTION ON UTEROPLACENTAL AND FETAL CIRCULATION [J].
ALAHUHTA, S ;
RASANEN, J ;
JOUPPILA, P ;
KANGASSAARELA, T ;
JOUPPILA, R ;
WESTERLING, P ;
HOLLMEN, AI .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 83 (01) :23-32
[2]   CARDIAC-ARREST FOLLOWING REGIONAL ANESTHESIA WITH ETIDOCAINE OR BUPIVACAINE [J].
ALBRIGHT, GA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1979, 51 (04) :285-287
[3]   A NEW NEUROLOGIC AND ADAPTIVE CAPACITY SCORING SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING OBSTETRIC MEDICATIONS IN FULL-TERM NEWBORNS [J].
AMIELTISON, C ;
BARRIER, G ;
SHNIDER, SM ;
LEVINSON, G ;
HUGHES, SC ;
STEFANI, SJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1982, 56 (05) :340-350
[4]   A NEW METHOD FOR MEASURING MOTOR BLOCK IN THE LOWER-EXTREMITIES [J].
AXELSSON, K ;
HALLGREN, S ;
WIDMAN, B ;
JOHANSSON, A ;
OLSTRIN, PO .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1985, 29 (01) :72-78
[5]  
BADER AM, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V68, P724
[6]   COMPARISON OF EXTRADURAL ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE [J].
BROCKWAY, MS ;
BANNISTER, J ;
MCCLURE, JH ;
MCKEOWN, D ;
WILDSMITH, JAW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 66 (01) :31-37
[7]   THE INFLUENCE OF CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE ANALGESIA ON THE 2ND STAGE OF LABOR AND METHOD OF DELIVERY IN NULLIPAROUS WOMEN [J].
CHESTNUT, DH ;
VANDEWALKER, GE ;
OWEN, CL ;
BATES, JN ;
CHOI, WW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 66 (06) :774-780
[8]   CLINICAL EFFECTS AND MATERNAL AND FETAL PLASMA-CONCENTRATION OF EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE VERSUS BUPIVACAINE FOR CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
DATTA, S ;
CAMANN, W ;
BADER, A ;
VANDERBURGH, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (06) :1346-1352
[9]   A double-blind comparison of 0.25 % ropivacaine and 0.25 % bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour [J].
Eddleston, JM ;
Holland, JJ ;
Griffin, RP ;
Corbett, A ;
Horsman, EL ;
Reynolds, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (01) :66-71
[10]   COMPARATIVE MOTOR-BLOCKING EFFECTS OF BUPIVACAINE AND ROPIVACAINE, A NEW AMINO AMIDE LOCAL-ANESTHETIC, IN THE RAT AND DOG [J].
FELDMAN, HS ;
COVINO, BG .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1988, 67 (11) :1047-1052