Detection of hepatic lesions in candidates for surgery: Comparison of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT

被引:60
作者
Bluemke, DA
Paulson, EK
Choti, MA
DeSena, S
Clavien, PA
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.175.6.1751653
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of phased array MR imaging of the liver at 1.5 T with and without ferumoxides with dual-phase helical CT for the detection of hepatic lesions in candidates for hepatic surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Patients with known or suspected hepatic: lesions who were eligible for surgery underwent dual-phase helical CT at 20 and 70 sec after the start of contrast material injection and phased array MR imaging using fast spin-echo T2-weighted imaging and gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging before and after ferumoxides infusion of 0.56 mg of iron per kilogram of body weight. Three observers who were unaware of the surgical findings separately reviewed the CT scans and unenhanced and enhanced MR images of 24 patients who completed the protocol. The observers' findings were compared with results obtained at surgery using intraoperative sonography and having histopathologic confirmation. Statistical analysis was performed using a segment-by-segment analysis. RESULTS. Eighty-two lesions were found at surgery. The sensitivity of CT, unenhanced MR imaging, and enhanced MR imaging for blinded observers was 60.4%, 62.0%, and 68.2%, respectively. The specificity was 89.2%. 81.9% and 81.6%, respectively. Five lesions in three patients were not detected preoperatively using any of the techniques. MR imaging found additional lesions not detected on CT in four patients; CT detected one additional lesion not seen on MR imaging. CONCLUSION. Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging of the liver shows a trend toward increased sensitivity compared with dual-phase helical CT. Specificity of helical CT was superior to that of enhanced MR imaging for most observers.
引用
收藏
页码:1653 / 1658
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] HELICAL CT OF THE LIVER - VALUE OF AN EARLY HEPATIC ARTERIAL PHASE
    BONALDI, VM
    BRET, PM
    REINHOLD, C
    ATRI, M
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (02) : 357 - 363
  • [2] Do arterial phase helical CT images improve detection or characterization of colorectal liver metastases?
    Chen, IY
    Katz, DS
    Jeffrey, RB
    Daniel, BL
    Li, KCP
    Beaulieu, CF
    Mindelzun, RE
    Yao, D
    Olcott, EW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1997, 21 (03) : 391 - 397
  • [3] APPLICATION OF THE MCNEMAR TEST TO NON-INDEPENDENT MATCHED PAIR DATA
    ELIASZIW, M
    DONNER, A
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1991, 10 (12) : 1981 - 1991
  • [4] DETECTION OF LIVER METASTASES - COMPARISON OF SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE-ENHANCED AND UNENHANCED MR-IMAGING ART 1.5 T WITH DYNAMIC CT, INTRAOPERATIVE US, AND PERCUTANEOUS US
    HAGSPIEL, KD
    NEIDL, KFW
    EICHENBERGER, AC
    WEDER, W
    MARINCEK, B
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (02) : 471 - 478
  • [5] HAIDER MA, 1995, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V46, P98
  • [6] DETECTION OF FOCAL HEPATIC MASSES - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION WITH CT, DELAYED CT, CT DURING ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY, AND MR IMAGING
    HEIKEN, JP
    WEYMAN, PJ
    LEE, JKT
    BALFE, DM
    PICUS, D
    BRUNT, EM
    FLYE, MW
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (01) : 47 - 51
  • [7] HOLLINGER MA, 1995, RES COMMUN ALCOHOL S, V16, P1
  • [8] Focal hepatic lesion detection: Comparison of four T2-weighted MR imaging pulse sequences
    Kanematsu, M
    Hoshi, H
    Murakami, T
    Inaba, Y
    Hori, M
    Nandate, Y
    Yokoyama, R
    Nakamura, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (01) : 167 - 175
  • [9] Portal-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT for the detection of malignant hepatic tumors: Sensitivity based on comparison with intraoperative and pathologic findings
    Kuszyk, BS
    Bluemke, DA
    Urban, BA
    Choti, MA
    Hruban, RH
    Sitzmann, JV
    Fishman, EK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (01) : 91 - 95
  • [10] LINDBERG CG, 1993, ACTA RADIOL, V34, P139