Empirical study of parental recall bias

被引:106
作者
Infante-Rivard, C
Jacques, L
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Joint Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A3, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Joint Dept Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A3, Canada
[3] Univ Sherbrooke, Fac Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
关键词
bias (epidemiology); case-control studies; child; electromagnetic fields; epidemiologic methods; leukemia; recall; x-rays;
D O I
10.1093/aje/152.5.480
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Recall bias is a major concern in case-control studies in which questionnaire data are used to assess past exposure. The authors conducted a validation substudy within the framework of a parent case-control study on risk factors for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children aged less than or equal to 9 years diagnosed in 1980-1993 in Quebec, Canada. Parental recall bias for two variables was assessed: reported distance from home to power lines compared with measured distance and reported prenatal radiographic examinations compared with hospital medical record data. For reported distance, sensitivity was 62% for a subgroup of cases living in an area in which an excess of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia was perceived and was attributed to power lines. However, for other cases, sensitivity (35%) was similar to that measured for hospital controls (36%) and was relatively close to that for population controls (22%), Specificity was high for all groups except cases from the area with a perceived excess. Sensitivity for reported prenatal radiographic examinations was similar for cases (64%) and population controls (71%) but was lower for hospital controls (50%), Results confirm that under special circumstances, such as those resulting from enhanced public concern, parental recall can be differential but otherwise is most often nondifferential, with low sensitivity. Choosing the best type of controls to ensure comparable recall accuracy remains difficult.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 486
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   VALIDITY OF EXPOSURE DATA OBTAINED BY QUESTIONNAIRE - 2 EXAMPLES FROM OCCUPATIONAL REPRODUCTIVE STUDIES [J].
AHLBORG, GA .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1990, 16 (04) :284-288
[2]  
Armstrong B.K.W.E., 1994, Principles of Exposure Measurement in Epidemiology
[3]   The performance of several indicators in detecting recall bias [J].
Basso, O ;
Olsen, J ;
Bisanti, L ;
Karmaus, W ;
Juul, S ;
Fletcher, T ;
Bolumar, F ;
FigaTalamanca, I ;
Thonneau, P ;
Pantelakis, S .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 8 (03) :269-274
[4]   RECALL BIAS IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES [J].
COUGHLIN, SS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (01) :87-91
[5]   RECALL BIAS IN A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT [J].
DELGADORODRIGUEZ, M ;
GOMEZOLMEDO, M ;
BUENOCAVANILLAS, A ;
GARCIAMARTIN, M ;
GALVEZVARGAS, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (09) :1133-1140
[6]   PREGNANCY, DELIVERY, AND NEONATAL COMPLICATIONS AMONG AUTISTIC-CHILDREN [J].
DEYKIN, EY ;
MACMAHON, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1980, 134 (09) :860-864
[7]   THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENTIAL RECALL ON THE RESULTS OF CASE-CONTROL STUDIES [J].
DREWS, CD ;
GREELAND, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 19 (04) :1107-1112
[8]   RECALL BIAS IN A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF SUDDEN-INFANT-DEATH-SYNDROME [J].
DREWS, CD ;
KRAUS, JF ;
GREENLAND, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 19 (02) :405-411
[9]   DETERMINANTS OF RECALL AND RECALL BIAS IN STUDYING DRUG AND CHEMICAL-EXPOSURE IN PREGNANCY [J].
FELDMAN, Y ;
KOREN, G ;
MATTICE, D ;
SHEAR, H ;
PELLEGRINI, E ;
MACLEOD, SM .
TERATOLOGY, 1989, 40 (01) :37-45
[10]   TAP OR BOTTLED WATER-CONSUMPTION AND SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION IN A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF REPORTING CONSISTENCY [J].
FENSTER, L ;
WINDHAM, GC ;
SWAN, SH ;
EPSTEIN, DM ;
NEUTRA, RR .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 3 (02) :120-124