TWO STRATEGIES FOR INDUCTIVE REASONING IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH

被引:225
作者
Ketokivi, Mikko [1 ,2 ]
Mantere, Saku [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] IE Business Sch, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Hanken Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Rouen Business Sch, Rouen, France
关键词
STORIES; SCIENCE; OPPORTUNITIES; RETHINKING; CONSTRUCTS; KNOWLEDGE; ECONOMICS; MYSTERY;
D O I
10.5465/AMR.2010.48463336
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Incompleteness of inductive reasoning presents an enduring dilemma for organizational researchers. We examine two practical reasoning strategies-idealization and contextualization-that can be used at the pinnacle of this dilemma: when theoretical conclusions are drawn from empirical data. Understanding the two strategies can lead to more effective argumentation and evaluation. Appreciating the methodological incompleteness of both strategies, in turn, helps us distinguish between the methodological and the policy dimensions of organization-scientific debates.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 333
页数:19
相关论文
共 101 条
[61]  
Mahoney J.T., 2005, Economic Foundations of Strategy, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781452229850, 10.4135/9781452229850]
[62]  
MARTIN J, 2005, OXFORD HDB ORG THEOR, P392
[63]   DECONSTRUCTING ORGANIZATIONAL TABOOS: THE SUPPRESSION OF GENDER CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS [J].
Martin, Joanne .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1990, 1 (04) :339-359
[64]  
MAZEN AM, 1987, ACAD MANAGE J, V30, P369, DOI 10.5465/256280
[65]  
Mc Grath J., 1982, JUDGEMENT CALLS RES
[66]  
McKelvey B, 1997, ORGAN SCI, V8, P352
[67]  
McKelvey B., 2002, COMPANION ORG, P752
[68]  
McKinley W, 2008, ACAD MANAGE REV, V33, P541
[69]  
MOLDOVEANU MC, 2002, BLACKWELL COMPANION, P733
[70]  
NAGEL E, 1965, MEANING KNOWLEDGE SY, P315