Can the social trust promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China

被引:85
作者
Pan, Zicheng [1 ]
Liu, Liang [1 ]
Bai, Shuyuan [2 ]
Ma, Qianting [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 2 Southeast Univ Rd, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Normal Univ, Bussiness Sch, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Social trust; Corporate green innovation; Informal institutions; China; PRODUCT INNOVATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; ECO-INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; TECHNOLOGY; FIRMS; PROFITABILITY; PRESSURES;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-14293-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Corporate green innovation has played a crucial role in balancing profitability and environmental protection. The existing research on determinant factors of green innovation has its main defects in emphasizing excessively enterprise's formal institutional environment and neglecting the informal institutional environment, causing an incomplete understanding of the relationship between institutional environments and corporate green innovation. To bridge this gap, using a sample of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed firms in manufacturing industry during the period of 2010-2016, we investigate how social trust, an important informal institutions, affects corporate green innovation. Our results show that social trust is positively associated with green innovation, remaining valid after applying endogenous and robustness tests. In addition, the positive relationship between social trust and green innovation is more prominent when the enterprise is non-state-owned or locates in a looser command-and-control (CAC) environmental regulations region. Further analysis shows that social trust boosts corporate green innovation via promoting knowledge sharing, decreasing financing constraints, and fulfilling more corporate social responsibility (CSR). This paper enriches the literature concerning social trust and green innovation and draws back more public attention on the role of informal institutions play in promoting green innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:52157 / 52173
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
[31]   Cultural and Institutional Bifurcation: China and Europe Compared [J].
Greif, Avner ;
Tabellini, Guido .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (02) :135-140
[32]   The role of social capital in financial development [J].
Guiso, L ;
Sapienza, P ;
Zingales, L .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (03) :526-556
[33]   Trusting the stock market [J].
Guiso, Luigi ;
Sapienza, Paola ;
Zingales, Luigi .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2008, 63 (06) :2557-2600
[34]   Does gender diversity matter for green innovation? [J].
He, Xiaoping ;
Jiang, Shuo .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 28 (07) :1341-1356
[35]  
Huang RH, 2020, Handbook on Facilitating Flexible Learning During Educational Disruption: The Chinese Experience in Maintaining Undisrupted Learning in COVID-19 Outbreak, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3544750, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3544750]
[37]   Political considerations in the decision of Chinese SOEs to list in Hong Kong [J].
Hung, Mingyi ;
Wong, T. J. ;
Zhang, Tianyu .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2012, 53 (1-2) :435-449
[38]   Audit Fees and Social Capital [J].
Jha, Anand ;
Chen, Yu .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 90 (02) :611-639
[39]   The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation. Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany [J].
Kammerer, Daniel .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (8-9) :2285-2295
[40]   Can cultural norms reduce conflicts? Confucianism and peasant rebellions in Qing China [J].
Kung, James Kai-sing ;
Ma, Chicheng .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2014, 111 :132-149