Activity of ebastine (10 and 20 mg) and cetirizine at 24 hours of a steady state treatment in the skin of healthy volunteers

被引:18
作者
Frossard, N
Benabdesselam, O
Purohit, A
Mounedji, N
Pauli, G
机构
[1] Fac Pharm, INSERM, U425, F-67401 Illkirch, France
[2] Hop Univ, Serv Pneumol, Strasbourg, France
[3] Rhone Poulenc Rorer, F-92120 Montrouge, France
关键词
antihistamines; skin test; ebastine; cetirizine; allergy; allergic rhinitis; atopy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1472-8206.2000.tb00423.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
We have compared the inhibitory effects of ebastine (10 mg), ebastine (20 mg) and cetirizine (10 mg) on histamine-induced wheal and Rare skin reactions 24 h following a 6-day-long treatment. This was a double-blind, randomised, crossover, placebo-controlled study involving 24 healthy volunteers (18-65 years) with negative skin prick tests and the absence of specific IgEs to common allergens. Subjects were randomised to receive each of the following treatments once daily for 6 days: ebastine (10 mg), ebastine (10 mg), cetirizine (10 mg) or placebo with a washout period of 5 days. Twenty-four hours after the last dose of each treatment, histamine skin prick tests were performed (0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 and 200 mg/mL), and wheal and flare responses were measured. All active treatments produced significant inhibition of the wheal responses compared to placebo (P < 0.001). Wheal response inhibition was significantly better with 20 mg of ebastine compared with 10 mg of ebastine and 10 mg of cetirizine. In a comparison to histamine concentrations required to produce a wheal surface area of 10 mm(2), 20 mg of ebastine was also significantly better than ebastine 10 mg and cetirizine (P < 0.001), and 10 mg ebastine: was significantly better than cetirizine (P < 0.05). Highly significant (P < 0.001) effects on the Rare response were observed with each active treatment compared to placebo, with no difference between groups. The frequency of adverse events, primarily somnolence, was similar among the four treatment groups. Our results clearly indicate that ebastine, at either recommended dosage of 10 and 20 mg, and cetirizine produced significant inhibition of the histamine-induced wheal and Rare reaction compared to placebo for up to 24 h. A superior efficacy of 20 mg of ebastine is observed compared with 10 mg of ebastine and 10 mg of cetirizine on the skin wheal response 24 h after the last dose of a 6-day-long treatment. This study clearly proves ebastine to be an effective, truly once-daily antihistamine. (C) 2000 Editions scientifiques ct medicales Elsevier SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 413
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Bousquet J, 1998, CLIN EXP ALLERGY, V28, P49
[2]   A 12-week, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of ebastine, 10 and 20 mg once daily, in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis [J].
Bousquet, J ;
Gaudaño, EM ;
Carlos, AGP ;
Staudinger, H .
ALLERGY, 1999, 54 (06) :562-568
[3]   Ebastine in context - Introduction [J].
Buendia, E .
DRUGS, 1996, 52 :1-7
[4]   Comparison of the efficacy of ebastine 10mg and 20mg once daily with that of cetirizine 10mg once daily in adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis - A multicentre double-blind study [J].
Cohen, B ;
Gehanno, P .
DRUGS, 1996, 52 :26-29
[5]   Consistency of the efficacy of cetirizine and ebastine on skin reactivity [J].
Frossard, N ;
Melac, M ;
Benabdesselam, O ;
Pauli, G .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 80 (01) :61-65
[6]   Comparison of ebastine to cetirizine in seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults [J].
Gehanno, P ;
BremardOury, C ;
Zeisser, P .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 76 (06) :507-512
[7]   Comparison of azelastine nasal spray and oral ebastine in treating seasonal allergic rhinitis [J].
Hernandez, DJC ;
Aqilar, JLP ;
Romero, JD ;
Baehre, M .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 1995, 13 (06) :299-304
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF ASTEMIZOLE, CETIRIZINE AND LORATADINE ON THE TIME COURSE OF WEAL AND FLARE REACTIONS TO HISTAMINE, CODEINE AND ANTIGEN [J].
HUMPHREYS, F ;
HUNTER, JAA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1991, 125 (04) :364-367
[9]   Double-blind multicentre comparative study of ebastine, terfenadine and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria in adults [J].
Kalis, B .
DRUGS, 1996, 52 :30-34
[10]  
LEVER LR, 1992, SKIN PHARMACOL, V5, P29