Development and examination of an expectancy-based measure of test-taking motivation

被引:82
作者
Sanchez, RJ
Truxillo, DM
Bauer, TN
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Sch Business Adm, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Portland State Univ, Dept Psychol, Portland, OR 97207 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.739
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A 10-item multidimensional measure of test-taking motivation based on expectancy theory, the Valence, Instrumentality, Expectancy Motivation Scale (VIEMS), was developed using a student sample (N = 90) and tested using 2 samples of job applicants in a field settings (N = 296; N = 246). In Field Study 1, the VIEMS was related to test performance. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that the VIEMS explained variance in test score beyond a general measure of rest motivation. In a second longitudinal field study, pretest and posttest perceptions of motivation were compared. Results indicated that expectancy was related to actual test performance, and perceived test performance accounted for variance in posttest reports of motivation after controlling for pretest levels of motivation. Test-taking motivation did not account for variance in test performance differences between African Americans and Whites in either field study.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 750
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]   EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF MOTIVATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF TASK PERFORMANCE - INTERACTIVE EFFECTS BETWEEN INSTRUMENTALITY-VALENCE AND MOTIVATION-ABILITY [J].
GALBRAITH, J ;
CUMMINGS, LL .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1967, 2 (03) :237-257
[12]   THE PERCEIVED FAIRNESS OF SELECTION SYSTEMS - AN ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE [J].
GILLILAND, SW .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1993, 18 (04) :694-734
[13]   EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE ON REACTIONS TO A SELECTION SYSTEM [J].
GILLILAND, SW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 79 (05) :691-701
[14]   WHY IS THERE NO STUDY OF CULTURAL EQUIVALENCE IN STANDARDIZED COGNITIVE-ABILITY TESTING [J].
HELMS, JE .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1992, 47 (09) :1083-1101
[15]   A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires [J].
Hinkin, Timothy R. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1998, 1 (01) :104-121
[16]   EXPECTANCY-THEORY MEASURES - AN EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON IN AN EXPERIMENTAL SIMULATION [J].
ILGEN, DR ;
NEBEKER, DM ;
PRITCHARD, RD .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1981, 28 (02) :189-223
[17]  
Joreskog K. G., 1989, LISREL VII: A Guide to the Program and Application
[18]  
Kanfer R., 1990, HDB IND ORG PSYCHOL, P75, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1744-6570.1973.TB0
[19]   THE EFFECTS OF APPLICANTS REACTIONS TO COGNITIVE-ABILITY TESTS AND AN ASSESSMENT-CENTER [J].
MACAN, TH ;
AVEDON, MJ ;
PAESE, M ;
SMITH, DE .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 47 (04) :715-738
[20]  
MEDSKER GJ, 1994, J MANAGE, V20, P439, DOI 10.1016/0149-2063(94)90022-1