Technology adoption and innovation in public services the case of e-government in Italy

被引:45
作者
Arduini, Davide [2 ]
Belotti, Federico [3 ]
Denni, Mario [1 ]
Giungato, Gerolamo [4 ]
Zanfei, Antonello [2 ]
机构
[1] Autorita Garante Concorrenza & Mercato, I-00198 Rome, RM, Italy
[2] Univ Urbino Carlo BO, Fac Econ, Dipartimento Econ & Metodi Quantitativi, I-61029 Urbino, PU, Italy
[3] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Fac Econ, I-00133 Rome, RM, Italy
[4] Ist Nazl Stat, I-00184 Rome, RM, Italy
关键词
Innovation system; Dynamic capabilities; Technology adoption; Electronic government; Innovation in services; Two-part model; KNOWLEDGE; DEMAND; FIRM;
D O I
10.1016/j.infoecopol.2009.12.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using data from 1176 Italian municipalities in 2005, we identify factors associated with the development of e-government services supplied by local public administrations (PAs). We show that the combination of internal competencies and context-specific factors is different when explaining decisions to start e-government activities vs. the intensity of such activities. Municipalities involved in e-government are larger, carry out more in-house ICT activities and are more likely to have intranet infrastructures than PAs that do not offer front-office digitized services. They are also generally located in regions having relatively large shares of firms using or producing ICTs, where many other municipalities offer digitized services, and where population density is relatively low. The range and quality of e-government services supplied by local PAs tend to increase with their stock of ICT competencies, their efforts to train workers, and with their ability to organise efficient interfaces with end-users. Moreover, there is a correlation between the range and quality of e-government services offered and the broadband infrastructure development in the area where local PAs are located. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 275
页数:19
相关论文
共 79 条
[41]  
Hartley J, 2006, INNOVATION IMPROVEME
[42]  
Helfat C.E., 2007, Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations
[43]   Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography [J].
Howells, JRL .
URBAN STUDIES, 2002, 39 (5-6) :871-884
[44]  
Lazonick W., 2005, The oxford Handbook of Innovation
[45]  
LIMONARD S, 2005, 16 EUR REG C INT TEL
[46]  
Lundvall B., 2010, National systems of innovation
[47]  
Lundvall B.A., 1985, The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope, V31, P39
[48]   SECTORAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION: A FRAMEWORK FOR LINKING INNOVATION TO THE KNOWLEDGE BASE, STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF SECTORS [J].
Malerba, Franco .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 14 (1-2) :63-82
[49]   TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION [J].
MANSFIELD, E .
ECONOMETRICA, 1961, 29 (04) :741-766
[50]  
METCALFE S, 2000, INNOVATION SYSTEM SE