DNA copy number alterations in prostate cancers: A combined analysis of published CGH studies

被引:121
作者
Sun, Jishan
Liu, Wennuan
Adams, Tamara S.
Sun, Jielin
Li, Xingnan
Turner, Aubrey R.
Chang, Baoli
Kim, Jin Woo
Zheng, Siqun Lilly
Isaacs, William B.
Xu, Jianfeng
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Human Genom, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
somatic; gain; deletion;
D O I
10.1002/pros.20543
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Identifying genomic regions that are commonly deleted or gained in neoplastic cells is an important approach to identify tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. Studies in the last two decades have identified a number of common DNA copy number alterations in prostate cancer. However, because of various sample sizes, diverse tumor types and sources, as well as; a variety of detection methods with various sensitivities and resolutions, it is difficult to summarize and fully interpret the overall results. METHODS. We performed a combined analysis of all published comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) studies of prostate cancer and estimated the frequency of alterations across the genome for all tumors, as well as in advanced and localized tumors separately. A total of 41 studies examining 872 cancers were included in this study. RESULTS. The frequency of deletions and gains were estimated in all tumors, as well as in advanced and localized tumors. Eight deleted and five gained regions were found in more than 10% of the prostate tumors. An additional six regions were commonly deleted and seven were commonly gained in advanced tumors. While 8p was the most common location of deletion, occurring in about a third of all tumors and about half of advanced tumors, 8q was the most commonly gained region, affecting about a quarter of all tumors and about half of all advanced tumors. CONCLUSIONS. The large number of tumors examined in this combined analysis provides better estimates of the frequency of specific alterations in the prostate cancer cell genome, and offers important clues for prioritizing efforts to identify tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes in these altered regions.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 700
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [51] Microdissection, DOP-PCR, and comparative genomic hybridization of paraffin-embedded familial prostate cancers
    Verhagen, PCMS
    Zhu, XL
    Rohr, LR
    Cannon-Albright, LA
    Tavtigian, SV
    Skolnick, MH
    Brothman, AR
    [J]. CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 2000, 122 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [52] Deletion of chromosomal region 6q14-16 in prostate cancer
    Verhagen, PCMS
    Hermans, KGL
    Brok, MO
    van Weerden, WM
    Tilanus, MGJ
    De Weger, RA
    Boon, TA
    Trapman, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 102 (02) : 142 - 147
  • [53] IN-VIVO AMPLIFICATION OF THE ANDROGEN RECEPTOR GENE AND PROGRESSION OF HUMAN PROSTATE-CANCER
    VISAKORPI, T
    HYYTINEN, E
    KOIVISTO, P
    TANNER, M
    KEINANEN, R
    PALMBERG, C
    PALOTIE, A
    TAMMELA, T
    ISOLA, J
    KALLIONIEMI, OP
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 1995, 9 (04) : 401 - 406
  • [54] VISAKORPI T, 1995, CANCER RES, V55, P342
  • [55] Williams L, 1997, AM BOOK REV, V18, P4
  • [56] Genetic changes in stage pT2N0 prostate cancer studied by comparative genomic hybridization
    Wolter, H
    Gottfried, HW
    Mattfeldt, T
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 89 (03) : 310 - 316
  • [57] Chromosomal changes in incidental prostatic carcinomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization
    Wolter, H
    Trijic, D
    Gottfried, HW
    Mattfeldt, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 41 (03) : 328 - 334
  • [58] Accuracy of an array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) technique in detecting DNA copy number aberrations: comparison with conventional CGH and loss of heterozygosity analysis in prostate cancer
    Yano, S
    Matsuyama, H
    Matsuda, K
    Matsumoto, H
    Yoshihiro, S
    Naito, K
    [J]. CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 2004, 150 (02) : 122 - 127
  • [59] Three-color FISH analysis of TMPRSS2/ERG fusions in prostate cancer indicates that genomic microdeletion of chromosome 21 is associated with rearrangement
    Yoshimoto, Maisa
    Joshua, Anthony M.
    Chilton-MacNeill, Susan
    Bayani, Jane
    Selvarajah, Shamini
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Zielenska, Maria
    Squire, Jeremy A.
    [J]. NEOPLASIA, 2006, 8 (06): : 465 - 469
  • [60] Genome-wide characterization of gene expression variations and DNA copy number changes in prostate cancer cell lines
    Zhao, HJ
    Kim, Y
    Wang, P
    Lapointe, J
    Tibshirani, R
    Pollack, JR
    Brooks, JD
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2005, 63 (02) : 187 - 197