Parasocial Interaction and Parasocial Relationship: Conceptual Clarification and a Critical Assessment of Measures

被引:383
作者
Dibble, Jayson L. [1 ]
Hartmann, Tilo [2 ]
Rosaen, Sarah F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hope Coll, Dept Commun, Holland, MI 49423 USA
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Commun Sci, De Boelelaan 1081, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Michigan Flint, Dept Commun & Visual Arts, Flint, MI 48502 USA
关键词
Parasocial Interaction; Parasocial Relationship; Media Effects; Scale Validation; Measurement; TELEVISION CHARACTERS; RELATIONSHIP CLOSENESS; AUDIENCE ACTIVITY; VALIDITY; MEDIA; EXPERIENCE; INTIMACY; VIEWERS; SCALE; TV;
D O I
10.1111/hcre.12063
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship are often conflated conceptually and methodologically, leaving researchers unclear as to which concept is being tapped. This research clarifies these concepts and experimentally compares the most common measure of parasocial interaction, the Parasocial Interaction Scale (PSI-Scale), with a newer measure, the Experience of Parasocial Interaction Scale (EPSI-Scale). Participants (N = 383) viewed a brief videorecording of a woman who either bodily addressed the viewer or not, then completed a questionnaire. The EPSI-Scale was a better measure of parasocial interaction, understood as a within-viewing experience of mutual awareness, whereas the PSI-Scale may measure short- or long-term liking, or something else. To avoid conceptual and empirical confusion, researchers must choose measures with greater care.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 44
页数:24
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]   Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity [J].
Cohen, J .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2004, 21 (02) :187-202
[12]  
Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[13]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[14]   CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS [J].
CRONBACH, LJ ;
MEEHL, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) :281-302
[15]   Reconceptualizing Address in Television Programming: The Effect of Address and Affective Empathy on Viewer Experience of Parasocial Interaction [J].
Cummins, R. Glenn ;
Cui, Boni .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2014, 64 (04) :723-742
[16]   Parasocial Interaction as More Than Friendship Evidence for Parasocial Interactions With Disliked Media Figures [J].
Dibble, Jayson L. ;
Rosaen, Sarah F. .
JOURNAL OF MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY-THEORIES METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2011, 23 (03) :122-132
[17]   The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS): Reliability and Validity Evidence for a New Measure of Relationship Closeness [J].
Dibble, Jayson L. ;
Levine, Timothy R. ;
Park, Hee Sun .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 24 (03) :565-572
[18]   TELEVISION CHARACTERS AS SIGNIFICANT OTHERS AND THE PROCESS OF VICARIOUS ROLE-TAKING [J].
ELLIS, GJ ;
STREETER, SK ;
ENGELBRECHT, JD .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES, 1983, 4 (02) :367-384
[19]   SOCIAL-ISOLATION AND SOCIAL SUPPORT AS CORRELATES OF TELEVISION VIEWING MOTIVATIONS [J].
FINN, S ;
GORR, MB .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1988, 15 (02) :135-158
[20]   DURATION NEGLECT IN RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATIONS OF AFFECTIVE EPISODES [J].
FREDRICKSON, BL ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 65 (01) :45-55