Patient entry into randomized controlled trials of colorectal cancer treatment: Factors influencing participation

被引:43
作者
Solomon, MJ
Pager, CK
Young, JM
Roberts, R
Butow, P
机构
[1] Cent Sydney Area Hlth Serv, SOuRCe, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1067/msy.2003.119
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The objective of this study was to investigate willingness to participate in hypothetical surgical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among patients and clinicians, who answered as if they themselves were patients. Methods. We interviewed consecutive Patients with colorectal cancer admitted for surgery at a tertiary center in Sydney, Australia. We mailed a questionnaire to all colorectal surgeons and medical oncologists in Australia. Results. Overall, 42 % (95 % CI, 32 % to 52 %) of patients, 44 % (95 % CI, 29 % to 60 %) of surgeons, and 63 % (95 % CI, 53 % to 72 %) of oncologists were willing to enter a randomized clinical trial. Oncologists were significantly more likely to participate than either surgeons (P <. 001) or patients (P = .001). No significant associations were seen between willingness to participate and patient characteristics. "Risk of cancer recurrence" was rated by the most patients and doctors as an important reason for refusal of trial entry, although patients additionally identified dislike of randomization and quality of life concerns as important barriers. Conclusion. More than 40 % of patients were willing to enter into a hypothetical RCT involving surgery. Aversion to randomization and perceptions of differential impact of treatment on cancer recurrence and quality of life are likely to be major barriers to patient accrual in trials of colorectal cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 613
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
BAROFSKY I, 1979, CANCER CLIN TRIALS, V2, P237
[2]   PATIENTS ATTITUDES TO PARTICIPATION IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BEVAN, EG ;
CHEE, LC ;
MCGHEE, SM ;
MCINNES, GT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 35 (02) :204-207
[3]   Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: Findings of the SUPPORT project [J].
Covinsky, KE ;
Fuller, JD ;
Yaffe, K ;
Johnston, CB ;
Hamel, MB ;
Lynn, J ;
Teno, JM ;
Phillips, RS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (05) :S187-S193
[4]   Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: A review of the literature [J].
Ellis, PM .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 (08) :939-945
[5]   Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments [J].
Fagerlin, A ;
Ditto, PH ;
Danks, JH ;
Houts, RM ;
Smucker, WD .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 20 (03) :166-175
[7]   EQUIPOISE AND THE ETHICS OF CLINICAL RESEARCH [J].
FREEDMAN, B .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 317 (03) :141-145
[8]   Randomized, controlled trials in surgery - Perceived barriers and attitudes of Australian colorectal surgeons [J].
Gattellari, M ;
Ward, JE ;
Solomon, MJ .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (10) :1413-1420
[9]  
Kennelly C, 2001, QUAL HEALTH CARE, V10, pI23
[10]  
KESHAVA A, 2002, ANZ J SURG S, V72, pA23