Patient entry into randomized controlled trials of colorectal cancer treatment: Factors influencing participation

被引:43
作者
Solomon, MJ
Pager, CK
Young, JM
Roberts, R
Butow, P
机构
[1] Cent Sydney Area Hlth Serv, SOuRCe, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1067/msy.2003.119
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The objective of this study was to investigate willingness to participate in hypothetical surgical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among patients and clinicians, who answered as if they themselves were patients. Methods. We interviewed consecutive Patients with colorectal cancer admitted for surgery at a tertiary center in Sydney, Australia. We mailed a questionnaire to all colorectal surgeons and medical oncologists in Australia. Results. Overall, 42 % (95 % CI, 32 % to 52 %) of patients, 44 % (95 % CI, 29 % to 60 %) of surgeons, and 63 % (95 % CI, 53 % to 72 %) of oncologists were willing to enter a randomized clinical trial. Oncologists were significantly more likely to participate than either surgeons (P <. 001) or patients (P = .001). No significant associations were seen between willingness to participate and patient characteristics. "Risk of cancer recurrence" was rated by the most patients and doctors as an important reason for refusal of trial entry, although patients additionally identified dislike of randomization and quality of life concerns as important barriers. Conclusion. More than 40 % of patients were willing to enter into a hypothetical RCT involving surgery. Aversion to randomization and perceptions of differential impact of treatment on cancer recurrence and quality of life are likely to be major barriers to patient accrual in trials of colorectal cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 613
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF PROCEDURES FOR OBTAINING INFORMED CONSENT IN CLINICAL-TRIALS OF TREATMENT FOR CANCER [J].
SIMES, RJ ;
TATTERSALL, MHN ;
COATES, AS ;
RAGHAVAN, D ;
SOLOMON, HJ ;
SMARTT, H .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 293 (6554) :1065-1068
[22]   VOLUNTEERS OR VICTIMS - PATIENTS VIEWS OF RANDOMIZED CANCER CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
SLEVIN, M ;
MOSSMAN, J ;
BOWLING, A ;
LEONARD, R ;
STEWARD, W ;
HARPER, P ;
MCILLMURRAY, M ;
THATCHER, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 71 (06) :1270-1274
[23]   SHOULD WE BE PERFORMING MORE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS EVALUATING SURGICAL OPERATIONS [J].
SOLOMON, MJ ;
MCLEOD, RS .
SURGERY, 1995, 118 (03) :459-467
[24]   Surgery and the randomised controlled trial: past, present and future [J].
Solomon, MJ ;
McLeod, RS .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1998, 169 (07) :380-383
[25]   CLINICAL-STUDIES IN SURGICAL JOURNALS - HAVE WE IMPROVED [J].
SOLOMON, MJ ;
MCLEOD, RS .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1993, 36 (01) :43-48
[26]  
SOLOMON MJ, 1994, SURGERY, V115, P707
[27]   PHYSICIANS REASONS FOR NOT ENTERING ELIGIBLE PATIENTS IN A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF SURGERY FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
TAYLOR, KM ;
MARGOLESE, RG ;
SOSKOLNE, CL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 310 (21) :1363-1367
[28]  
Till J E, 1992, Qual Life Res, V1, P31, DOI 10.1007/BF00435433
[29]   Determinants of patient participation in clinical studies requiring informed consent: Why patients enter a clinical trial [J].
Verheggen, FWSM ;
Nieman, F ;
Jonkers, R .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1998, 35 (02) :111-125
[30]   For and against - Clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial [J].
Weijer, C ;
Shapiro, SH ;
Glass, KC ;
Enkin, MW .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7263) :756-758