Government's awareness of Environmental protection and corporate green innovation: A natural experiment from the new environmental protection law in China

被引:219
作者
Fang, Zhenming [1 ,2 ]
Kong, Xiaoran [2 ,3 ]
Sensoy, Ahmet [4 ]
Cui, Xin [2 ]
Cheng, Feiyang [2 ]
机构
[1] Bohai Secur, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Jinan, Peoples R China
[4] Bilkent Univ, Fac Business Adm, Ankara, Turkey
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental protection regulation; Green innovation; Information disclosure; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; INVESTMENT EVIDENCE; RISK EVIDENCE; FIRM; PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVENESS; DISCLOSURE; INCENTIVES; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2021.03.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on the impact of the new environmental protection law promulgated by the Chinese government in 2015, we employ the difference-in-differences (DID) approach to investigate the impact of government environmental regulation on corporate green innovation. The evidence shows that government environmental regulation can significantly increase the number of green patents of heavily polluting industries. This result holds after a series of robustness tests. The analysis of the economic mechanism indicates that the new environmental protection law brings supervision pressure to heavily polluting firms, prompting them to improve the quality of information disclosure, thus improving green innovation. In addition, the regional economic development level, government subsidies, and public supervision can significantly affect the positive impact of the new environmental protection law. Meanwhile, the effect is more prominent in non-stateowned enterprises and in firms with small scale, low profitability, and weak internal governance. (C) 2021 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 312
页数:19
相关论文
共 65 条
[41]   Corporate Voluntary Carbon Information Disclosure: Evidence from China's Listed Companies [J].
Peng, Juan ;
Sun, Jianfei ;
Luo, Rui .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2015, 38 (01) :91-109
[42]   Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches [J].
Petersen, Mitchell A. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (01) :435-480
[43]   International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies:: the effects of NOx and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany [J].
Popp, D .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 51 (01) :46-71
[44]   Induced innovation and energy prices [J].
Popp, D .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (01) :160-180
[45]   TOWARD A NEW CONCEPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT-COMPETITIVENESS RELATIONSHIP [J].
PORTER, ME ;
VANDERLINDE, C .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (04) :97-118
[46]  
Qi S., 2018, EC RES J, V12, P129, DOI DOI 10.2746/ECREJ.201812129143
[47]   Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors [J].
Rubashkina, Yana ;
Galeotti, Marzio ;
Verdolini, Elena .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 83 :288-300
[48]   Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994-2006 [J].
Salama, A. ;
Anderson, K. ;
Toms, J. S. .
BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2011, 20 (02) :192-204
[49]  
Schiavon M, 2020, SELENIUM RESEARCH FOR ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN HEALTH: PERSPECTIVES, TECHNOLOGIES AND ADVANCEMENTS, P35
[50]   Could environmental regulation and R&D tax incentives affect green product innovation? [J].
Song, Malin ;
Wang, Shuhong ;
Zhang, Hongyan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 258