Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer

被引:168
作者
Milki, AA [1 ]
Jun, SH [1 ]
Hinckley, MD [1 ]
Behr, B [1 ]
Giudice, LC [1 ]
Westphal, LM [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
blastocyst transfer; monozygotic twinning; cleavage stage transfer; multiple gestations; IVF;
D O I
10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04754-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the incidence of monozygotic twinning (MZT) in pregnancies conceived after blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: University IVF program. Patient(s): All IVF patients with viable pregnancies conceived during a 4-year period. Intervention(s): Blastocyst transfer or day 3 ET. Main Outcome Measure(s): Incidence of MZT assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. Result(s): There were 11 incidences of MZT in 197 viable pregnancies (5.6%) with blastocyst transfer compared to 7 of 357 viable pregnancies (2%) with day 3 ET. In 10 of 18 pregnancies, MZT was observed in the setting of a higher order multiple gestation (6 of 11 for blastocyst transfer and 4 of 7 for day 3 ET). In the day 3 ET group, assisted hatching or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) did not increase MZT (4 of 213, 1.9%) compared to cycles without zona breaching (3 of 144, 2.1%). Similarly, in the blastocyst-transfer group, ICSI did not increase the incidence of MZT (4 of 74, 5.5% for ICSI and 7 of 123, 5.7% for non-ICSI IVF). Conclusion(s): Compared to day 3 ET, blastocyst transfer appears to significantly increase the incidence of gestations with MZT. This information should be taken into account when counseling patients about the pros and cons of extended culture.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 506
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   Do assisted reproductive technologies have effects on the demography of monozygotic twinning? [J].
Saito, H ;
Tsutsumi, O ;
Noda, Y ;
Ibuki, Y ;
Hiroi, M .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (01) :178-179
[22]   Monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive techniques: a phenomenon independent of micromanipulation [J].
Schachter, M ;
Raziel, A ;
Friedler, S ;
Strassburger, D ;
Bern, O ;
Ron-El, R .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (06) :1264-1269
[23]   Does assisted hatching pose a risk for monozygotic twinning in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization? [J].
Schieve, LA ;
Meikle, SF ;
Peterson, HB ;
Jeng, G ;
Burnett, NM ;
Wilcox, LS .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (02) :288-294
[24]   Blastocyst culture and transfer increases the efficiency of oocyte donation [J].
Schoolcraft, WB ;
Gardner, DK .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (03) :482-486
[25]   The potential association between blastocyst transfer and monozygotic twinning [J].
Sheiner, E ;
Har-Vardi, I ;
Potashnik, G .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 75 (01) :217-218
[26]   Human zona pellucida micromanipulation and monozygotic twinning frequency after IVF [J].
Sills, ES ;
Moomjy, M ;
Zaninovic, N ;
Veeck, LL ;
McGee, M ;
Palermo, GD ;
Rosenwaks, Z .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (04) :890-895
[27]   Monoamniotic twinning and zona manipulation: A survey of US IVF centers correlating zona manipulation procedures and high-risk twinning frequency [J].
Slotnick, RN ;
Ortega, JE .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1996, 13 (05) :381-385
[28]  
Steinman G, 2001, J REPROD MED, V46, P1003
[29]   Increase in the monozygotic twinning rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and blastocyst stage embryo transfer [J].
Tarlatzis, BC ;
Qublan, HS ;
Sanopoulou, T ;
Zepiridis, L ;
Grimbizis, G ;
Bontis, J .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (01) :196-198
[30]   Blastocyst transfer: A useful tool for reduction of high-order multiple gestations in a human assisted reproduction program [J].
Toledo, AA ;
Wright, G ;
Jones, AE ;
Smith, SS ;
Johnson-Ward, J ;
Brockman, WW ;
Ng, F ;
Wininger, JD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (02) :377-379