Is There Faster Recovery With an Anterior or Anterolateral THA? A Pilot Study

被引:74
作者
Klausmeier, Virginia [1 ]
Lugade, Vipul [1 ]
Jewett, Brian A. [2 ]
Collis, Dennis K. [2 ]
Chou, Li-Shan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Mot Anal Lab, Dept Human Physiol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Slocum Ctr, Eugene, OR USA
关键词
TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; DIRECT LATERAL APPROACH; GAIT ANALYSIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; ABDUCTOR FUNCTION; REPLACEMENT; DISLOCATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; MOTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-009-1075-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Surgical technique is an important factor affecting recovery of hip function after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We therefore asked whether short-term recovery of hip strength and motion would differ between the anterior and anterolateral THA approaches. We presumed that although both approaches would improve hip function by 16 weeks postsurgery when compared with presurgery, a slower recovery would be demonstrated by the anterolateral group at 6 weeks when compared with the anterior group as a result of division and reattachment of the abductor muscles. We observed hip kinematics and kinetics during walking and isometric hip abductor strength for the involved limb. Hip abductor strength of all patients was lower than controls at all three testing times. Compared with presurgery, all patients demonstrated improved abductor strength at 16 weeks postsurgery. At 6 weeks, the patients with an anterior approach had improved late stance peak abductor moment postsurgery and reached the level of controls, but those with an anterolateral approach did not. Although the anterior approach was associated with improved gait velocity and peak flexor moments at 6 weeks compared to before surgery, we observed no differences between the two approaches for most of the isometric strength and dynamic gait measures at 6 or 16 weeks. Neither approach provided faster recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 541
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]
Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach [J].
Kennon, RE ;
Keggi, JM ;
Wetmore, RS ;
Zatorski, LE ;
Huo, MH ;
Keggi, KJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A :39-48
[12]
Keppel G., 1989, DATA ANAL RES DESIGN
[13]
Martini F.H., 2003, Human Anatomy, V4
[14]
Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation [J].
Masonis, JL ;
Bourne, RB .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (405) :46-53
[15]
Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table [J].
Matta, JM ;
Shahrdar, C ;
Ferguson, T .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (441) :115-124
[16]
Vertical ground reaction forces: objective measures of gait following hip arthroplasty [J].
McCrory, JL ;
White, SC ;
Lifeso, RM .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2001, 14 (02) :104-109
[17]
Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty [J].
Mont, Michael A. ;
Seyler, Thorsten M. ;
Ragland, Phillip S. ;
Starr, Roland ;
Erhart, Jochen ;
Bhave, Anil .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (01) :100-108
[18]
A modified direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty - A comprehensive review [J].
Mulliken, BD ;
Rorabeck, CH ;
Bourne, RB ;
Nayak, N .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (07) :737-747
[19]
Obesity and perioperative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients [J].
Namba, RS ;
Paxton, L ;
Fithian, DC ;
Stone, ML .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (07) :46-50
[20]
Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty [J].
Perron, M ;
Malouin, F ;
Moffet, H ;
McFadyen, BJ .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 15 (07) :504-515