Comparison of the SimPlate™ total plate count method with Petrifilm™, Redigel™, and conventional pour-plate methods for enumerating aerobic microorganisms in foods

被引:40
作者
Beuchat, LR
Copeland, F
Curiale, MS
Danisavich, T
Gangar, V
King, BW
Lawlis, TL
Likin, RO
Okwusoa, J
Smith, CF
Townsend, DE
机构
[1] IDEXX Labs Inc, Westbrook, ME 04092 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Ctr Food Safety & Qual Enhancement, Griffin, GA 30223 USA
[3] Goldkist Res Lab, Sumter, SC 29150 USA
[4] Silliker Labs, Chicago, IL 60473 USA
[5] Perdue Farms Inc, Dothan, AL USA
[6] Bob Evans Farms Inc, Columbus, OH 43207 USA
[7] Genoa Sausage, Woburn, MA 01801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X-61.1.14
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The SimPlate(TM) Total Plate Count (TPC) method, developed by IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., is designed to determine the mast probable number of aerobic microorganisms in foods. The 24-h test was compared to the conventional plate count agar (PCA) method, the Petrifilm(TM) Aerobic Count plates, and the Redigel(TM) Total Count procedure for enumerating microflora in 751 food samples. Results using the SimPlate(TM) TPC method were highly correlated (r greater than or equal to 0.96) with results from other test methods. Slopes (0.96-0.97) were not significantly different from 1, and) y intercepts (-0.03-0.08) were not different from 0. The SimPlate(TM) has a high counting range (>1600 most probable number per single dilution), thus requiring fewer dilutions of samples compared to other methods evaluated. Some foods, e.g., raw liver, wheat flour, and nuts, contain enzymes that gave false-positive reactions on SimPlates(TM). Overall, however, the SimPlate(TM) TPC method is a suitable alternative to conventional PCA, Petrifilm(TM), and Redigel(TM) methods for estimating populations of mesophilic aerobic microorganisms in a wide range of foods.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 18
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
ABRGRALL B, 1990, J FOOD PROTECT, V53, P213
[2]  
*AOAC, 1986, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V69, P376
[3]   DETERMINATION OF AEROBIC PLATE AND YEAST AND MOLD COUNTS IN FOODS USING AN AUTOMATED HYDROPHOBIC GRID-MEMBRANE FILTER TECHNIQUE [J].
BRODSKY, MH ;
ENTIS, P ;
ENTIS, MP ;
SHARPE, AN ;
JARVIS, GA .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1982, 45 (04) :301-304
[4]   COMPARISON OF REDIGEL, PETRIFILM, SPIRAL PLATE SYSTEM, ISOGRID, AND AEROBIC PLATE-COUNT FOR DETERMINING THE NUMBERS OF AEROBIC-BACTERIA IN SELECTED FOODS [J].
CHAIN, VS ;
FUNG, DYC .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1991, 54 (03) :208-211
[5]   COMPARISON OF MACERATION AND ENUMERATION PROCEDURES FOR AEROBIC COUNT IN SELECTED SEAFOODS BY STANDARD METHOD, PETRIFILM(TM), REDIGEL(TM), AND ISOGRID [J].
CORMIER, A ;
CHIASSON, S ;
LEGER, A .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1993, 56 (03) :249-&
[6]  
GINN RE, 1986, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V69, P527
[7]   ENUMERATION OF AEROBIC PLATE-COUNT AND ESCHERICHIA-COLI DURING BLUE-CRAB PROCESSING BY STANDARD METHODS, PETRIFILM, AND REDIGEL [J].
INGHAM, SC ;
MOODY, MW .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1990, 53 (05) :423-&
[8]   EVALUATION OF THE 3M PETRIFILM CULTURE PLATE METHOD FOR ENUMERATING AEROBIC FLORA AND COLIFORMS IN POULTRY-PROCESSING FACILITIES [J].
MCALLISTER, JS ;
STADTHERR, MP ;
FOX, TL .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1988, 51 (08) :658-&
[9]  
TOWNSEND DE, 1996, 96 GEN M AM SOC MICR, P382
[10]  
TOWNSEND DE, 1997, COMMUNICATION