Product category familiarity and preference construction

被引:131
作者
Coupey, E [1 ]
Irwin, JR
Payne, JW
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] NYU, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/209521
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Marketers often base decisions about marketing strategies on the results of research designed to elicit information about consumers' preferences. A large body of research indicates, however, that preferences often are labile. That is, preferences can be reversed depending on factors such as how the preference is elicited. In three studies, we examine the effect of familiarity in two preference-elicitation tasks, choice and matching judgments. We provide evidence of an interaction between familiarity and response mode (choice or matching) in each study. In study 3, we test the explanation that preference reversals may occur when the interaction of response mode with product-category familiarity leads to systematic changes in attribute weighting.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 468
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
AACKER DA, 1991, MANAGING BRAND EQUIT
[2]   DIMENSIONS OF CONSUMER EXPERTISE [J].
ALBA, JW ;
HUTCHINSON, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (04) :411-454
[3]   EFFECTS OF PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE AND PHASE OF THE CHOICE PROCESS ON CONSUMER DECISION-PROCESSES - A PROTOCOL ANALYSIS [J].
BETTMAN, JR ;
PARK, CW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1980, 7 (03) :234-248
[4]   HYPOTHESIZED AND CONFOUNDED EXPLANATIONS IN THEORY TESTS - A BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS [J].
BRINBERG, D ;
LYNCH, JG ;
SAWYER, AG .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1992, 19 (02) :139-154
[6]  
CARMON Z, 1996, CONSUMER ASSESSMENTS
[7]  
COX JC, 1992, PREFERENCE REVERSAL
[8]  
FISCHER GW, 1993, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V19, P580
[9]   VALUE ELICITATION - IS THERE ANYTHING IN THERE [J].
FISCHHOFF, B .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1991, 46 (08) :835-847
[10]   CONJOINT-ANALYSIS IN MARKETING - NEW DEVELOPMENTS WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE [J].
GREEN, PE ;
SRINIVASAN, V .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (04) :3-19