The benefits of prenatal care: evidence from the PAT bus strike

被引:89
作者
Evans, WN [1 ]
Lien, DS
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Econ, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Maryland Populat Res Ctr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] NBER, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] CNA Corp, Alexandria, VA 22311 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
prenatal care; birth outcomes; natural experiment;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using data from the 1990-1994 Natality Detail files, we examine the impact of prenatal visits oil birth outcomes using the 1992 Port Authority Transit strike in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania as an exogenous source of variation in access to prenatal care. Our first-stage estimates demonstrate that black-inner city women pregnant at the time of the strike experienced a sharp decline in prenatal care visits. Using the bus strike as an instrument for prenatal care in birth outcome equations, we find that two-stage least-squares (2SLS) estimates of the impact of prenatal care on birth weight, gestation and maternal weight gain are similar to single-equation estimates. The 2SLS estimates are however imprecisely estimated. There is consistent and precise evidence that prenatal care visits reduced maternal smoking. Because the strike impacted women at different points in their pregnancy, we can isolate the impact of missing prenatal visits early or late in a pregnancy. We find suggestive evidence that visits lost early in the pregnancy negatively impact birth outcomes but there is little evidence of a cost to missing a visit late in the pregnancy. Our results do demonstrate the importance of public transportation in health care delivery for some groups. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 239
页数:33
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]   Cigarette taxes and smoking during pregnancy [J].
Ringel, JS ;
Evans, WN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (11) :1851-1856
[32]  
SABLE MR, 1990, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V105, P549
[33]   LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT - ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS [J].
SHIONO, PH ;
BEHRMAN, RE .
FUTURE OF CHILDREN, 1995, 5 (01) :4-18
[34]   A randomised controlled trial comparing two schedules of antenatal visits: The antenatal care project [J].
Sikorski, J ;
Wilson, J ;
Clement, S ;
Das, S ;
Smeeton, N .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7030) :546-553
[35]  
Strong ThomasH., 2000, EXPECTING TROUBLE MY
[36]  
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1990, DHHS PUBL, V(CDC)YO-K-116
[37]  
*US PHS, 1989, CAR OUT FUT CONT PRE
[38]   WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care [J].
Villar, J ;
Ba'aqeel, H ;
Piaggio, G ;
Lumbiganon, P ;
Belizán, JM ;
Farnot, U ;
Al-Mazrou, Y ;
Carroli, G ;
Pinol, A ;
Donner, A ;
Langer, A ;
Nigenda, G ;
Mugford, M ;
Fox-Rushby, J ;
Hutton, G ;
Bergsjo, P ;
Bakketeig, L ;
Berendes, H .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9268) :1551-1564