Variations on a human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias

被引:153
作者
Ito, TA
Cacioppo, JT
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02699930441000120
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The positivity offset refers to a tendency for the positive motivational system to respond more than the negative motivation system at low levels of evaluative input. The negativity bias refers to a tendency for the negative motivational system to respond more intensely than the positive motivational system when evaluative input increases. While there is evidence that these represent general aspects of evaluative responding, individuals also vary in their level of positivity offset and negativity bias. In two studies, we explore individual differences in these features of evaluative responding to determine if they are stable across time, internally consistent, only modestly related to self-report measures of affect, and have predictive validity. We found that individuals with stronger positivity offsets formed more positive impressions of targets described by only neutral information and individuals with stronger negativity biases formed even more negative impressions of targets described by negative information.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 26
页数:26
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]   Proposed Hostility and Pharisaic - Virtue Scales for the MMPI [J].
Cook, Walter W. ;
Medley, Donald M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1954, 38 (06) :414-418
[12]   GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY - A METAANALYSIS [J].
FEINGOLD, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1994, 116 (03) :429-456
[13]  
GARDNER WL, 1996, BIASES IMPRESSION FO
[14]   Individual differences in emotional experience: Mapping available scales to processes [J].
Gohm, CL ;
Clore, GL .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2000, 26 (06) :679-697
[15]  
Ito TA, 2001, HANDBOOK OF AFFECT AND SOCIAL COGNITION, P50
[16]  
Ito TA, 2000, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V36, P660, DOI 10.1006/jesp.2000.1430
[17]   Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations [J].
Ito, TA ;
Larsen, JT ;
Smith, NK ;
Cacioppo, JT .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (04) :887-900
[18]   The need to evaluate [J].
Jarvis, WBG ;
Petty, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 70 (01) :172-194
[19]   CHOICES, VALUES, AND FRAMES [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1984, 39 (04) :341-350
[20]  
Kanouse D.E., 1971, Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, P47