Cut-point shift and index shift in self-reported health

被引:246
作者
Lindeboom, M
van Doorslaer, E
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam, Tinbergen Inst Amsterdam, Dept Econ, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Inst Study Labor, IZA, Bonn, Germany
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
hierarchical ordered probit; health measurement; cut-point shift; index shift; Canada;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.01.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There is some concern that ordered responses on health questions may differ across populations or even across subgroups of a population. This reporting heterogeneity may invalidate group comparisons and measures of health inequality. This paper proposes a test for differential reporting in ordered response models which enables to distinguish between cut-point shift and index shift. The method is illustrated using Canadian National Population Health Survey data. The McMasterHealth Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) is used as a more objective health measure than the simple five-point scale of self-assessed health. We find clear evidence of index shifting and cut-point shifting for age and gender, but not for income, education or language. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1083 / 1099
页数:17
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The reliability of self-assessed health status [J].
Crossley, TF ;
Kennedy, S .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (04) :643-658
[2]   Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system [J].
Feeny, D ;
Furlong, W ;
Torrance, GW ;
Goldsmith, CH ;
Zhu, ZL ;
DePauw, S ;
Denton, M ;
Boyle, M .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (02) :113-128
[3]   MULTIATTRIBUTE HEALTH-STATUS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS - HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX [J].
FEENY, D ;
FURLONG, W ;
BOYLE, M ;
TORRANCE, GW .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1995, 7 (06) :490-502
[4]   SEMI-NONPARAMETRIC MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION [J].
GALLANT, AR ;
NYCHKA, DW .
ECONOMETRICA, 1987, 55 (02) :363-390
[5]   Adaptation and scale of reference bias in self-assessments of quality of life [J].
Groot, W .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2000, 19 (03) :403-420
[6]  
Hays RD, 2000, MED CARE, V38, P28
[7]   Income-related health inequality in Canada [J].
Humphries, KH ;
van Doorslaer, E .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 50 (05) :663-671
[8]   SUBJECTIVE HEALTH MEASURES AND STATE - DEPENDENT REPORTING ERRORS [J].
KERKHOFS, M ;
LINDEBOOM, M .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1995, 4 (03) :221-235
[9]  
MURRAY CJL, 2001, 4L GPE WHOEIP
[10]  
SADANA R, 2000, 15 GPE EIPEBD WHO