Ultrasound-guided interscalene needle placement produces successful anesthesia regardless of motor stimulation above or below 0.5 mA

被引:35
作者
Sinha, Sanjay K.
Abrams, Jonathan H.
Weller, Robert S.
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] St Francis Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Hartford, CT USA
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000271912.84440.01
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: We quantified the motor response after ultrasound (U-S)-guided needle placement for interscalene block (ISB). We then compared block characteristics based on motor response above or below 0.5 mA. METHODS: Sixty-one patients scheduled for ambulatory shoulder surgery under ISB and general anesthesia were included in this prospective, observational study. Preoperatively, an insulated needle was positioned by U-S in the interscalene groove. The lowest current producing motor response was determined, and 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine was injected. Motor and sensory block were tested in the upper trunk distribution for 15 min until general anesthesia was induced. Postoperatively, the success of upper trunk block, pain score in the postanesthesia care unit and block duration, and analgesic tablet consumption overnight were recorded. Patients were divided a priori into Group A (current <= 0.5 mA) and Group B (current >0.5 mA), and results were compared between groups. RESULTS: The observed current range was 0.14-1.7 mA, with current <= 0.5 mA in 42% of patients (Group A). All patients had complete sensorimotor upper trunk block and none required narcotics in the postanesthesia care unit. Block duration (both groups: 17.8 +/- 4.9 h, mean +/-SD) and home analgesic use were equivalent. Sensory block onset was equivalent between groups, but incomplete motor block at 15 min was more likely in Group B: 37% vs 12% in Group A (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: During U-S-guided ISB using nerve stimulation, the observed motor response below or above 0.5 mA had no impact on success or duration of upper trunk block.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 852
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BASHEIN G, 1984, ANESTH ANALG, V63, P919
[2]  
BROWN DL, 1998, NEURAL BLOCKADE CLIN, P351
[3]   What is the relationship between paresthesia and nerve stimulation for axillary brachial plexus block? [J].
Choyce, A ;
Chan, VWS ;
Middleton, WJ ;
Knight, PR ;
Peng, P ;
McCartney, CJL .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2001, 26 (02) :100-104
[4]   Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia - Current state of the art [J].
Gray, AT .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 104 (02) :368-373
[5]   Finding nerves is not simple [J].
Hogan, Q .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2003, 28 (05) :367-371
[6]   Painful paresthesiae are infrequent during brachial plexus localization using low-current peripheral nerve stimulation [J].
Karaca, P ;
Hadzic, A ;
Yufa, M ;
Vloka, JD ;
Brown, AR ;
Visan, A ;
Sanborn, K ;
Santos, AC .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2003, 28 (05) :380-383
[7]  
Kawabata H, 2000, BRACHIAL PLEXUS PALS, P1
[8]   Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia [J].
Marhofer, P ;
Greher, M ;
Kapral, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 94 (01) :7-17
[9]   Brachial plexus sonography: A technique for assessing the root level [J].
Martinoli, C ;
Bianchi, S ;
Santacroce, E ;
Pugliese, F ;
Graif, M ;
Derchi, LE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) :699-702
[10]   Brachial plexus anesthesia: Essentials of our current understanding [J].
Neal, JM ;
Hebl, JR ;
Gerancher, JC ;
Hogan, QH .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (04) :402-428