Emergence agitation after sevoflurane versus propofol in pediatric patients

被引:229
作者
Uezono, S
Goto, T
Terui, K
Ichinose, F
Ishguro, Y
Nakata, Y
Morita, S
机构
[1] Teikyo Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Chiba, Japan
[2] Ichihara Hosp, Chiba, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1213/00000539-200009000-00012
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Sevoflurane may be associated with a high incidence of emergence agitation in preschool children. We tested the hypothesis that maintenance of anesthesia with propofol after sevoflurane induction would reduce the incidence of this excitatory behavior compared with continuing sevoflurane for maintenance. We conducted a randomized, single-blinded, two-period, cross-over study in 16 preschool age children undergoing repeated brief general anesthetics for eye examination. After sevoflurane induction, patients were randomly assigned to receive either sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia for maintenance. The alternative anesthetic was used for the maintenance of anesthesia on the second occasion. We compared the speed and quality of recovery characteristics of these anesthetics, as well as, overall parent satisfaction with anesthesia. Eight patients first received sevoflurane and the remaining eight patients first received propofol. Of the patients who received sevoflurane for the maintenance of anesthesia, 38% developed emergence agitation. Ln contrast, none developed emergence agitation when propofol was administered for maintenance of anesthesia. Despite emergence agitation, sevoflurane provided a shorter postanesthesia care unit stay than propofol. Parent satisfaction with anesthesia was greater with propofol than with sevoflurane.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 566
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Greater incidence of delirium during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in preschool boys [J].
Aono, J ;
Ueda, W ;
Mamiya, K ;
Takimoto, E ;
Manabe, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (06) :1298-1300
[2]   Recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane in preschool-aged children undergoing bilateral myringotomy and pressure equalization tube insertion [J].
Davis, PJ ;
Greenberg, JA ;
Gendelman, M ;
Fertal, K .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (01) :34-38
[3]   SURROGATE END-POINTS - ARE THEY MEANINGFUL [J].
FISHER, DM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (04) :795-796
[4]   Maintenance and recovery characteristics after sevoflurane or propofol during ambulatory surgery in children with epidural blockade [J].
Guard, BC ;
Sikich, N ;
Lerman, J ;
Levine, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1998, 45 (11) :1072-1078
[5]   Effects of sevoflurane anaesthesia on recovery in children: a comparison with halothane [J].
Lapin, SL ;
Auden, SM ;
Goldsmith, LJ ;
Reynolds, AM .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 9 (04) :299-304
[6]   SEVOFLURANE IN PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA [J].
LERMAN, J .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (06) :S4-S10
[7]   Induction, recovery, and safety characteristics of sevoflurane in children undergoing ambulatory surgery - A comparison with halothane [J].
Lerman, J ;
Davis, PJ ;
Welborn, LG ;
Orr, RJ ;
Rabb, M ;
Carpenter, R ;
Motoyama, E ;
Hannallah, R ;
Haberkern, CM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (06) :1332-1340
[8]   Recovery characteristics of sevoflurane- or propofol-based anaesthesia for day-care surgery [J].
Raeder, J ;
Gupta, A ;
Pedersen, FM .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 41 (08) :988-994
[9]   Recovery profile, costs, and patient satisfaction with propofol and sevoflurane for fast-track office-based anesthesia [J].
Tang, J ;
Chen, L ;
White, PF ;
Watcha, MF ;
Wender, RH ;
Naruse, R ;
Kariger, R ;
Sloninsky, A .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (01) :253-261
[10]   Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients [J].
Welborn, LG ;
Hannallah, RS ;
Norden, JM ;
Ruttimann, UE ;
Callan, CM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (05) :917-920