SELECTION OF RATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHOD BY APPLYING NEW STEP-WISE WEIGHT ASSESSMENT RATIO ANALYSIS (SWARA)

被引:946
作者
Kersuliene, Violeta [1 ]
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [1 ]
Turskis, Zenonas [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Sauletekio Al 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
SWARA; dispute resolution; decision-making; ratio analysis; BLOCKS MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; DECISION-MAKING; MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION; GAME-THEORY; MODEL; ATTRIBUTES; RANKING; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3846/jbem.2010.12
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper considers major principles of application of the multi-attribute systems to solve legislative tasks. In order to assess dispute resolution methods from economic, social and other points of view, it is necessary to apply methods for assessing solutions according to multiple attributes. All known multi-attribute methods cannot value the atribute weights as one weight of attribute is higher or lower significant than the other attribute. The new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis method (SWARA) allows including experts, lawyers or dispute parties opinion about significance ratio of the attributes in the process of rational decision determination. SWARA method could be applied in practical implementation of specialised decision support systems and alternative dispute resolution in virtual environment. Starting with principles and established approaches, a problem-structuring methodology was developed which would condition the problem to allow a more thoughtful application of existing decision-making analytic methodologies.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 258
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1950, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, CONSTITUTION REPUBLI
[3]   MULTIPLE CRITERIA CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DECISIONS CONSIDERING RELATIONS BETWEEN CRITERIA [J].
Antucheviciene, Jurgita ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Zakarevicius, Algimantas .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2010, 16 (01) :109-125
[4]  
Arditi D., 1999, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, V14, P385, DOI 10.1111/0885-9507.00157
[5]   Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach [J].
Banaitiene, Nerija ;
Banaitis, Audrius ;
Kaklauskas, Arturas ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 36 (03) :429-441
[6]   PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Kazemadeh, R. B. ;
Albadvi, A. ;
Aghdasi, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (01) :198-215
[7]   Introducing the logic and law corner [J].
Bench-Capon, Trevor ;
Prakken, Henry .
JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2008, 18 (01) :1-12
[8]   The next step: Research on how dispute system design affects function [J].
Bingham, LB .
NEGOTIATION JOURNAL-ON THE PROCESS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT, 2002, 18 (04) :375-379
[9]  
Brauers WKM, 2006, CONTROL CYBERN, V35, P445
[10]   PROJECT MANAGEMENT BY MULTIMOORA AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR TRANSITION ECONOMIES [J].
Brauers, Willem Karel M. ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2010, 16 (01) :5-24