The next step: Research on how dispute system design affects function

被引:8
作者
Bingham, LB [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, Indiana Conflict Resolut Inst, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
来源
NEGOTIATION JOURNAL-ON THE PROCESS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT | 2002年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00273.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Despite claims that ADR offers "better" solutions than traditional approaches (such as the courts), the field of dispute resolution has trouble proving its case. The reason is that we lack base-line data on the effectiveness of both traditional and nontraditional dispute resolution methods. Practitioners and researchers of dispute resolution should work together and in collaboration with public and private sector institutions to incorporate systemized data collection and evaluation into ADR practice. The growing subfield of dispute system design offers particularly rich ground for such collaboration between the research and practice communities.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 379
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Highlights of mediation at work:: Studies of the national REDRESS® evaluation project [J].
Bingham, LB ;
Pitts, DW .
NEGOTIATION JOURNAL, 2002, 18 (02) :135-146
[2]  
HENRY JF, 2000, J DISP RESOL, P63
[3]  
Kuhn TS, 1970, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, V2nd
[4]   Toward a program-based ADR research agenda [J].
McEwen, CA .
NEGOTIATION JOURNAL-ON THE PROCESS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT, 1999, 15 (04) :325-338
[5]  
OLEARY R, IN PRESS EVALUATING
[6]  
Sander F. E. A., 2000, J DISP RESOL, P3
[7]  
Ury WilliamL., 1988, GETTING DISPUTES RES
[8]  
Welsh Nancy, 2001, DISP RESOL MAGAZINE, V7, P20