The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence

被引:52
作者
Champion, Victoria
Skinner, Celette Sugg
Hui, Siu
Monahan, Patrick
Juliar, Beth
Daggy, Joanne
Menon, Usha
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Nursing, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
关键词
mammography; screening; intervention; tailored intervention;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.014
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this intervention was to increase mammography adherence in women who had not had a mammogram in the last 15 months. Methods: A prospective randomized intervention trial used four groups: (1) usual care, (2) tailored telephone counseling, (3) tailored print, (4) tailored telephone counseling and print. Participants included a total of 1244 women from two sites-a general medicine clinic setting serving predominately low-income clientele and a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO). Computer-tailored interventions addressed each woman's perceived risk of breast cancer, benefits and/or barriers and self-efficacy related to mammography screening comparing delivery by telephone and mail. Results: Compared to usual care all intervention groups increased mammography adherence significantly (odds ratio 1.60-1.91) when the entire sample was included. Conclusions: All interventions groups demonstrated efficacy in increasing mammography adherence as compared to a usual care group. When the intervention analysis considered baseline stage, pre contemplators (women who did not intend to get a mammogram) did not significantly increase in mammography adherence as compared to usual care. Practice implications: Women who are in pre contemplation stage may need a more intensive intervention. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 423
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] *AM CANC SOC, 2003, BREAST CANC FACTS FI, P23
  • [2] [Anonymous], J NATL CANC I MONOGR
  • [3] Mammographic screening: Patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival
    Blanchard, K
    Colbert, JA
    Puri, D
    Weissman, J
    Moy, B
    Kopans, DB
    Kaine, EM
    Moore, RH
    Halpern, EF
    Hughes, KS
    Tanabe, KK
    Smith, BL
    Michaelson, JS
    [J]. CANCER, 2004, 101 (03) : 495 - 507
  • [4] BNECKER MH, 1974, HLTH BELIEF MODEL PE, P150
  • [5] Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years
    Buist, DSM
    Porter, PL
    Lehman, C
    Taplin, SH
    White, E
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (19): : 1432 - 1440
  • [6] *CDCP, 2003, MAMM
  • [7] Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in nonadherent older women
    Champion, V
    Maraj, M
    Hui, S
    Perkins, AJ
    Tierney, W
    Menon, U
    Skinner, CS
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 36 (02) : 150 - 158
  • [8] CHAMPION V, 1995, CANCER NURS, V18, P53
  • [9] EFFECT OF INTERVENTIONS ON STAGE OF MAMMOGRAPHY ADOPTION
    CHAMPION, V
    HUSTER, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1995, 18 (02) : 169 - 187
  • [10] Champion V L, 2000, Oncol Nurs Forum, V27, P1565