Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: Effects of main field orientation and strength

被引:74
作者
Guermazi, A
Miaux, Y
Zaim, S
Peterfy, CG
White, D
Genant, HK
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
[2] SYNARC Inc, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
magnetic resonance (MR); artefact; metallic devices;
D O I
10.1016/S0009-9260(02)00540-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To determine the effect of metallic implant positioning on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging artefacts, and to determine the optimal imaging parameters for minimization of metallic artefacts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a phantom and in three joints with non-ferromagnetic metallic implants imaged at 1.5 and/or at 0.2 T, we examined the influence of the static magnetic field (B-0) strength and orientation, frequency-encoding direction, and type of imaging sequence on metallic artefacts. RESULTS: The impact of artefacts caused by metallic objects depends mainly on the relationship between the anatomy of interest and the orientation of the object relative to the direction of B-0. The main field strength plays a less important role, but its orientation depends on the type of MR imager. CONCLUSION: MR artefacts can be easily minimized by optimally positioning patients with metallic implants in the magnet. Knowledge of how this influences MR imaging is helpful in patient selection and guiding limb positioning. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 328
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ALANEN A, 1995, ACTA RADIOL, V36, P92
[2]   AN IN-VITRO STUDY AT LOW-FIELD FOR MR GUIDANCE OF A BIOPSY NEEDLE [J].
ARBOGASTRAVIER, S ;
GANGI, A ;
CHOQUET, P ;
BRUNOT, B ;
CONSTANTINESCO, A .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 13 (02) :321-324
[3]   MR IMAGING OF LARGE NONFERROMAGNETIC METALLIC IMPLANTS AT 1.5-T [J].
AUGUSTINY, N ;
VONSCHULTHESS, GK ;
MEIER, D ;
BOSIGER, P .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1987, 11 (04) :678-683
[4]   SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS IN 2DFT SPIN-ECHO AND GRADIENT-ECHO IMAGING - THE CYLINDER MODEL REVISITED [J].
BAKKER, CJG ;
BHAGWANDIEN, R ;
MOERLAND, MA ;
FUDERER, M .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 11 (04) :539-548
[5]   Integral method for numerical simulation of MRI artifacts induced by metallic implants [J].
Balac, S ;
Caloz, G ;
Cathelineau, G ;
Chauvel, B ;
de Certaines, JD .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 45 (04) :724-727
[6]  
BUXTON R, 1986, AM J NEURORADIOL, V7, P751
[7]   NONSUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS DUE TO METALLIC OBJECTS IN MR-IMAGING [J].
CAMACHO, CR ;
PLEWES, DB ;
HENKELMAN, RM .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 5 (01) :75-88
[8]   A comparison of conventional spin-echo and turbo spin-echo imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopedic hardware [J].
Eustace, S ;
Jara, H ;
Goldberg, R ;
Fenlon, H ;
Mason, M ;
Melhem, ER ;
Yucel, EK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (02) :455-458
[9]  
HACKL F, 1997, EUR RADIOL, V7, pS121
[10]  
JOSEPH PM, 1996, MAGNETIC RESONANCE I, P149