A Meta-Analytic Review of Achievement Goal Measures: Different Labels for the Same Constructs or Different Constructs With Similar Labels?

被引:810
作者
Hulleman, Chris S. [1 ,2 ]
Schrager, Sheree M. [3 ]
Bodmann, Shawn M. [4 ]
Harackiewicz, Judith M. [4 ]
机构
[1] James Madison Univ, Dept Grad Psychol, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA
[2] James Madison Univ, Ctr Assessment & Res Studies, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Los Angeles, Saban Res Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
achievement goals; meta-analysis; motivation; interest; performance; HIGH-SCHOOL-STUDENTS; HIERARCHICAL MODEL; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; LEARNING-STRATEGIES; SELF-EFFICACY; WORK DOMAIN; TASK-VALUE; MOTIVATION; ORIENTATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1037/a0018947
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis addresses whether achievement goal researchers are using different labels for the same constructs or putting the same labels on different constructs We systematically examined whether conceptual and methodological differences in the measurement of achievement goals moderated achievement goal intercorrelations and relationships with outcomes We reviewed 243 correlational studies of self-reported achievement goals comprising a total of 91,087 participants The items used to measure achievement goals were coded as being goal relevant (future-focused, cognitively represented, competence-related end states that the individual approaches or avoids) and were categorized according to the different conceptual definitions found within the literature. The results indicated that achievement goal outcome and goal goal correlations differed significantly depending on the goal scale chosen, the individual items used to assess goal strivings, and sociodemographic characteristics of the sample under study For example, performance-approach goal scales coded as having a majority of normatively referenced items had a positive correlation with performance outcomes ((r) over cap = 14), whereas scales with a majority of appearance and evaluative items had a negative relationship ((r) over cap = 14) Mastery-approach goal scales that contained goal-relevant language were not significantly related to performance outcomes ((r) over cap = 05), whereas those that did not contain goal-relevant language had a positive relationship with performance outcomes ((r) over cap = 14) We concluded that achievement goal researchers are using the same label for conceptually different constructs This discrepancy between conceptual and operational definitions and the absence of goal-relevant language in achievement goal measures may be preventing productive theory testing, research synthesis, and practical application
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 449
页数:28
相关论文
共 126 条
[82]  
McClelland DavidC., 1953, ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVE, DOI [10.1037/11144-000, DOI 10.1037/11144-000]
[83]  
MIDDLETON M, 1997, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[84]  
Middleton M.J., 2004, SOC PSYCHOL EDUC, V7, P289, DOI [DOI 10.1023/B:SP0E.0000037484.86850.FA, 10.1023/B:SPOE.0000037484.86850.fa, DOI 10.1023/B:SPOE.0000037484.86850.FA]
[85]   The development and validation of scales assessing students' achievement goal orientations [J].
Midgley, C ;
Kaplan, A ;
Middleton, M ;
Maehr, ML ;
Urdan, T ;
Anderman, LH ;
Anderman, E ;
Roeser, R .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 23 (02) :113-131
[86]   ''If I don't do well tomorrow, there's a reason'': Predictors of adolescents' use of academic self-handicapping strategies [J].
Midgley, C ;
Arunkumar, R ;
Urdan, TC .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 88 (03) :423-434
[87]   Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? [J].
Midgley, C ;
Kaplan, A ;
Middleton, M .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 93 (01) :77-86
[88]  
Midgley C., 2000, MANUAL PATTERNS ADAP
[89]  
Moller AC, 2006, FOCUS ON EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, P307
[90]   Effects of classroom context variables on high school students' judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating [J].
Murdock, TB ;
Miller, A ;
Kohlhardt, J .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 96 (04) :765-777