Dosimetric evaluation of MRI-based treatment planning for prostate cancer

被引:62
作者
Chen, L [1 ]
Price, RA [1 ]
Nguyen, TB [1 ]
Wang, L [1 ]
Li, JS [1 ]
Qin, L [1 ]
Ding, M [1 ]
Palacio, E [1 ]
Ma, CM [1 ]
Pollack, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/49/22/010
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric accuracy of MRI-based treatment planning for prostate cancer using a commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system. Three-dimensional conformal plans for 15 prostate patients were generated using the AcQPlan system. For each patient, dose distributions were calculated using patient CT data with and without heterogeneity correction, and using patient MRI data without heterogeneity correction. MR images were post-processed using the gradient distortion correction (GDC) software. The distortion corrected MR images were fused to the corresponding CT for each patient for target and structure delineation. The femoral heads were delineated based on CT. Other anatomic structures relevant to the treatment (i.e., prostate, seminal vesicles, lymph notes, rectum and bladder) were delineated based on MRI. The external contours were drawn separately on CT and MRI. The same internal contours were used in the dose calculation using CT- and MRI-based geometries by directly transferring them between MRI and CT as needed. Treatment plans were evaluated based on maximum dose, isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms. The results confirm previous investigations that there is no clinically significant dose difference between CT-based prostate plans with and without heterogeneity correction. The difference in the target dose between CT- and MRI-based plans using homogeneous geometry was within 2.5%. Our results suggest that MRI-based treatment planning is suitable for radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:5157 / 5170
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumours using MRI alone [J].
Beavis, AW ;
Gibbs, P ;
Dealey, RA ;
Whitton, VJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (845) :544-548
[2]  
Chen L, 2002, MED PHYS, V29, P1339
[3]   The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer [J].
Debois, M ;
Oyen, R ;
Maes, F ;
Verswijvel, G ;
Gatti, G ;
Bosmans, H ;
Feron, M ;
Bellon, E ;
Kutcher, G ;
Van Poppel, H ;
Vanuytsel, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (04) :857-865
[4]  
FINNIGAN DJ, 1997, P 19 LH GRAY C, P72
[5]   Aspects of MR image distortions in radiotherapy treatment planning [J].
Fransson, A ;
Andreo, P ;
Pötter, R .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2001, 177 (02) :59-73
[6]  
FRANSSON A, 1998, ONCOL, V48, pS187
[7]   Progress in 3D conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer [J].
Hanks, GE .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1999, 38 :69-74
[8]   Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: Five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Schultheiss, TE ;
Pinover, WH ;
Movsas, B ;
Epstein, BE ;
Hunt, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (03) :501-510
[9]   ACCURATE FRAMELESS REGISTRATION OF MR AND CT IMAGES OF THE HEAD - APPLICATIONS IN PLANNING SURGERY AND RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
HILL, DLG ;
HAWKES, DJ ;
GLEESON, MJ ;
COX, TCS ;
STRONG, AJ ;
WONG, WL ;
RUFF, CF ;
KITCHEN, ND ;
THOMAS, DGT ;
SOFAT, A ;
CROSSMAN, JE ;
STUDHOLME, C ;
GANDHE, AJ ;
GREEN, SEM ;
ROBINSON, GP .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 191 (02) :447-454
[10]   A comparison of clinical target volumes determined by CT and MRI for the radiotherapy planning of base of skull meningiomas [J].
Khoo, VS ;
Adams, EJ ;
Saran, F ;
Bedford, JL ;
Perks, JR ;
Warrington, AP ;
Brada, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (05) :1309-1317